Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26272712›Full record

Trial reportArchives of osteoporosis2015

New vertebral fractures after vertebroplasty: 2-year results from a randomised controlled trial.

M P Staples, B M Howe, M D Ringler, P Mitchell, C H R Wriedt, J D Wark, P R Ebeling, R H Osborne, D F Kallmes, R Buchbinder

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Archives of osteoporosis, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Clinical and radiological subsequent fractures after vertebral augmentation for treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

M P StaplesMonash Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Institute, Suite 41, 183 Wattletree Rd., Malvern, Victoria, 3144, Australia, margaret.staples@monash.edu.
B M Howe
M D Ringler
P Mitchell
C H R Wriedt
J D Wark
P R Ebeling
R H Osborne
D F Kallmes
R Buchbinder
Mayo Clinic · USThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUCabrini Hospital · AUDeakin University · AUMonash Medical Centre · AUThe Alfred Hospital · AU

Funding

SHAM-CONTROLLED TRIAL OF PERCUTANEOUS VERTEBROPLASTYR01AR049373 · NIAMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KALLMES, DAVID F · 2002 to 2008
$1.8M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR049373NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR49373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledA randomised controlled trial of vertebroplasty (VP) versus placebo assessed the effect of VP on the risk of further vertebral fractures. While no statistically significant between-group differences for new or progressed fracture risk at 12 and 24 months were observed, we observed a consistent trend towards higher risk of any type of fracture in the group undergoing VP. Our analysis was underpowered, and further adequately powered studies are needed to be able to draw firm conclusions about further vertebral risk with vertebroplasty. PURPOSE: This study seeks to assess the effect of VP on the risk of further radiologically apparent vertebral fracture within two years of the procedure.

methodsWe conducted a randomised placebo-controlled trial of VP in people with acute osteoporotic vertebral fracture. Eligible participants were randomly assigned to VP (n = 38) or placebo (n = 40). Cement volume and leakage were recorded for the VP group. Plain thoracolumbar radiographs were taken at baseline, 12 and 24 months. Two independent radiologists assessed these for new and progressed fractures at the same, adjacent and non-adjacent levels.

resultsAt 12 and 24 months, radiographs were available for 45 (58 %) and 47 (60 %) participants, respectively. There were no between-group differences for new or progressed fractures: 32 and 40 in the VP group after 12 and 24 months compared with 21 and 33 in the placebo group (hazard ratio (HR) 1.80, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.82 to 3.94). Similar results were seen when considering only adjacent (HR (95 % CI) 2.30 (0.57 to 9.29)) and non-adjacent (HR (95 % CI) 1.45 (0.55 to 3.81) levels. In all comparisons, there was a consistent trend towards higher risk of any type of fracture in the group undergoing VP. Within the VP group, fracture risk was unrelated to total (HR (95 % CI) 0.91 (0.71 to 1.17)) or relative (HR (95 % CI) 1.31 (0.15 to 11.48)) cement volume or cement leakage (HR (95 % CI) 1.20 (0.63 to 2.31)).

conclusionFor patients undergoing VP, our study did not demonstrate significant increases in subsequent fracture risk beyond that experienced by those with vertebral fractures who did not undergo the procedure. However, because of the non-significant numerical increases observed, studies with adequate power are needed to draw definite conclusions about fracture risk.

Indexed as

AgedBone CementsFemaleFractures, CompressionHumansMaleMiddle AgedOsteoporotic FracturesPostoperative ComplicationsRisk FactorsSpinal FracturesVertebroplastyBone Cements

Identifiers

PMID26272712
PMCPMC4871145
OpenAlexW1839816935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.