Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26272372›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2016

Safety and compatibility of magnetic-controlled growing rods and magnetic resonance imaging.

Henry R Budd, Oliver M Stokes, Judith Meakin, Jonathan Fulford, Michael Hutton

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Complications of growth-friendly techniques in early onset scoliosis of neurofibromatosis type 1: a case series.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. A pilot cadaveric study of temperature and adjacent tissue changes after exposure of magnetic-controlled growing rods to MRI.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2017
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Henry R BuddExeter Spine Unit, Princess Elizabeth Orthopaedic Centre, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Barrack Road, Exeter, UK. henry.budd@hotmail.com.
Oliver M StokesExeter Spine Unit, Princess Elizabeth Orthopaedic Centre, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Barrack Road, Exeter, UK.
Judith MeakinPhysics, College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Jonathan FulfordExeter NIHR Clinical Research Facility, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Michael HuttonExeter Spine Unit, Princess Elizabeth Orthopaedic Centre, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Barrack Road, Exeter, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMagnetically controlled growth rods (MCGRs) are a new technology for the management of early-onset pediatric deformity enabling guided spinal growth by controlling the curvature. These rods contain a rare earth magnet and are contraindicated for MRI. We have investigated the behavior MCGRs to determine whether MRI adversely affects rod properties and to determine the extent of image distortion.

methodsThis is an in vitro experiment using two magnetic growth rods secured in a 1.5 T MRI. A gradient echo sequence MRI was performed to evaluate whether the rods elongated, contracted or rotated during scanning and a phantom model was used to evaluate the amount of artifact induced.

resultsThe rod was not activated or subsequently impaired by the process of MRI. Image distortion of 28.9 cm along the long axis of the magnet and 20.1 cm perpendicular to this was seen with extension 10.6 cm cranial to the magnet housing. No negative effect was demonstrated on the magnetic rod elongation mechanism.

conclusionsThis study has demonstrated that there are no detrimental effects of MRI on the MCGR and imaging of the head and neck phantom can still be interpreted. Further in vivo study is warranted.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetsOrthopedic EquipmentSafetyArtifactsHumansIn Vitro TechniquesScoliosisGROWTHImagingMRIRodsScoliosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.