Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26272346›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2015

CoDiab-VD: protocol of a prospective population-based cohort study on diabetes care in Switzerland.

Emilie Zuercher, Julie Bordet, Bernard Burnand, Isabelle Peytremann-Bridevaux

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01902043 (CoDiab-VD), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01902043 unknown statusnot on this map

CoDiab-VD: a Population-based Cohort on Quality of Care of Patients With Diabetes in the Canton of Vaud (Switzerland)

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of Lausanne HospitalsRan2011 to 2022Enrolled1,033ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emilie ZuercherInstitute of social and preventive medicine (IUMSP), Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland. Emilie.Zuercher@chuv.ch.
Julie BordetInstitute of social and preventive medicine (IUMSP), Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland. juliebordet@ymail.com.
Bernard BurnandInstitute of social and preventive medicine (IUMSP), Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland. Bernard.Burnand@chuv.ch.
Isabelle Peytremann-BridevauxInstitute of social and preventive medicine (IUMSP), Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland. Isabelle.Peytremann-Bridevaux@chuv.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiabetes represents an increasing health burden worldwide. In 2010, the Public Health Department of the canton of Vaud (Switzerland) launched a regional diabetes programme entitled "Programme cantonal Diabète" (PcD), with the objectives to both decrease the incidence of diabetes and improve care for patients with diabetes. The cohort entitled CoDiab-VD emerged from that programme. It specifically aimed at following quality of diabetes care over time, at evaluating the coverage of the PcD within this canton and at assessing the impact of the PcD on care of patients with diabetes. METHODS/

designThe cohort CoDiab-VD is a prospective population-based cohort study. Patients with diabetes were recruited in two waves (autumn 2011--summer 2012) through community pharmacies. Eligible participants were non-institutionalised adult patients (≥ 18 years) with diabetes diagnosed for at least one year, residing in the canton of Vaud and coming to a participating pharmacy with a diabetes-related prescription. Women with gestational diabetes, people with obvious cognitive impairment or insufficient command of French were not eligible. Self-reported data collected, included the following primary outcomes: processes-of-care indicators (annual checks) and outcomes of care such as HbA1C, (health-related) quality of life measures (Short Form-12 Health Survey--SF-12, Audit of Diabetes-Dependent Quality of Life 19--ADDQoL) and Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC). Data on diabetes, health status, healthcare utilisation, health behaviour, self-management activities and support, knowledge of, or participation to, campaigns/activities proposed by the PcD, and socio-demographics were also obtained. For consenting participants, physicians provided few additional pieces of information about processes and laboratory results. Participants will be followed once a year, via a mailed self-report questionnaire. The core of the follow-up questionnaires will be similar to the baseline one, with the addition of thematic modules adapting to the development of the PcD. Physicians will be contacted every 2 years. DISCUSSION: CoDiab-VD will allow obtaining a broad picture of the care of patients with diabetes, as well as their needs regarding their chronic condition. The data will be used to evaluate the PcD and help prioritise targeted actions.

trial registrationThis study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT01902043, July 9, 2013.

Indexed as

Quality of Health CareAdultAgedAged, 80 and overClinical ProtocolsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHealth BehaviorHealth StatusHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesQuality of LifeResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID26272346
PMCPMC4536695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.