ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2015
An insight into hydration structure of sodium glycinate from ab initio quantum chemical study.
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ab initio study of hydrated cesium iodide dimer (CsI)Journal of molecular modeling · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The hydration structure of sodium glycinate (Na(+)GL(-)) is probed by the Monte-Carlo multiple minimum (MCMM) method combined with quantum mechanical (QM) calculations at the MP2/6-311++G(d,p) level. In the gas phase, the energy of [Na(+)GL(-)]β is more than 30 kJ mol(-1) higher than [Na(+)GL(-)]α. With higher degrees of hydration, our results indicate that the most stable conformers of [Na(+)GL(-)]∙(H2O)8 were derived from [Na(+)GL(-)]β instead of [Na(+)GL(-)]α. The stable conformers determined by the conductor-like polarizable continuum model (CPCM) also show that [Na(+)GL(-)]β is more stable than [Na(+)GL(-)]α in the liquid phase. By analyzing the hydration process, water…water hydrogen bonding interaction will be more preferable than ion…water interaction as the number of water molecules increases. According to the electronic density at the bond critical point on the Na-X bonds (X = O1, O2, N) in the low-energy conformers, Na(+)GL(-) will be dissociated as Na(+) and GL(-) in the bulk water, which is not predicted by the CPCM model. The structure features and the charge redistribution of Na(+)GL(-) will provide a physical explanation for the weakening Na-O1 interaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26271732What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.