Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26271545›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care2015

Differences between nurse- and physician-assessed ICU characteristics using a standardized survey.

Deena Kelly Costa, Courtney Colonna Kuza, Jeremy M Kahn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Deena Kelly CostaDepartment of Systems, Populations and Leadership, University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Courtney Colonna KuzaClinical Research, Investigation and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness (CRISMA) Center, Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Jeremy M KahnClinical Research, Investigation and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness (CRISMA) Center, Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Funding

Multidisciplinary Training in Critical Care Outcomes ResearchT32HL007820 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Timothy D Girard, Jeremy M Kahn · 1996 to 2026
$6.4M
Development of instrument--critical care organizationK23HL082650 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KAHN, JEREMY M · 2006 to 2010
$576k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23HL082650NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007820NHLBI NIH HHS T32HL007820
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSurveys are often used to assess intensive care unit (ICU) organizational characteristics for quality improvement. Typically these surveys target ICU nurse managers and/or physician directors. However, it is unclear whether these providers' assessments differ. We sought to determine whether differences existed in nurse- and physician-assessed ICU characteristics using a standardized survey.

designWe administered a previously developed survey to nurse managers and medical directors in adult ICUs within a single healthcare system in 2013. The survey asked about interprofessional staffing and evidence-based protocols. We examined differences between nurse managers' and medical directors' responses using McNemar's test and assessed concordance using the kappa statistic.

settingTwenty-three ICUs in 10 hospitals in Southwestern Pennsylvania.

resultsSixteen (69%) were specialty ICUs. The median number of ICU beds was 34. Concordance was moderate for high- vs. low-intensity physician staffing (κ = 0.60) and almost perfect on questions related to interprofessional staffing (κ = 0.83 nurse practitioners/physician assistants; 1.0 respiratory therapists; 0.83 physical therapists). However, concordance was slight to fair with regard to the presence of these providers on rounds (κ = 0.20-0.21) and poor to slight for protocols for liberation from mechanical ventilation (κ = 0.19), sedation (κ = -0.03) and central line insertion (κ = -0.03).

conclusionsDespite a standardized survey, we found substantial disagreement on ICU characteristics when assessed by the nurse manager or physician director. This study raises questions about the use of surveys to examine ICU organizational characteristics and suggests that differences in nurse managers' and medical directors' assessments could be helpful in guiding future ICU quality improvement projects.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHumansIntensive Care UnitsMedical Staff, HospitalNursing Staff, HospitalPennsylvaniaPersonnel Administration, HospitalPersonnel Staffing and SchedulingSurveys and Questionnairesgeneral methodology, intensive carequality improvementquality measurementsurveys

Identifiers

PMID26271545
PMCPMC4585482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.