ArticleJournal of clinical immunology2015
Validity of Primary Immunodeficiency Disease Diagnoses in United States Medicaid Data.
Article in Journal of clinical immunology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical implications of systematic phenotyping and exome sequencing in patients with primary antibody deficiency.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2019Article
- Prevalence of Granulomas in Patients With Primary Immunodeficiency Disorders, United States: Data From National Health Care Claims and the US Immunodeficiency Network Registry.Journal of clinical immunology · 2018Article
- Health-Related Quality of Life in Adult Patients with Common Variable Immunodeficiency Disorders and Impact of Treatment.Journal of clinical immunology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposePrimary immunodeficiency diseases (PID) are a rare group of disorders with a wide array of clinical presentations. The absence of validated methods to identify these diseases in electronic databases has limited understanding of their epidemiology and the impact of drug therapies on outcomes. We measured the positive predictive values (PPVs) of ICD-9 diagnoses for identifying PID within US Medicaid.
methodsWe identified Medicaid patients from California, Florida, New York, Ohio, and Pennsylvania with PID ICD-9 diagnoses (common variable immunodeficiency [279.06], X-linked agammaglobulinemia [279.04], hyper-immunoglobulin M syndrome [279.05], Wiskott Aldrich Syndrome [279.12]) recorded at least twice from 1999 to 2007. Outpatient records were reviewed by a clinical immunologist to adjudicate diagnoses. PPVs with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for confirmed outcomes were determined for individual ICD-9 diagnoses and combinations of diagnoses and Current Procedural Terminology codes for a quantitative immunoglobulin test (82784) or immunoglobulin infusion (96365).
resultsAmong 83 patients with PID ICD-9 diagnoses, 16 were adjudicated as having the condition (PPV, 19.3%; 95% CI, 11.4-29.4%). Individual ICD-9 diagnoses had low PPVs (range, 16.7-33.3%). Requiring procedural codes for quantitative immunoglobulins or intravenous immunoglobulin did not increase PPVs of these diagnoses (range, 11.1-41.7%). An X-linked agammaglobulinemia diagnosis plus intravenous immunoglobulin had the highest PPV among the algorithms evaluated (PPV, 41.7%; 95% CI, 15.1-72.3%).
conclusionsAlgorithms comprising PID ICD-9 diagnoses and procedures for quantitative immunoglobulin tests and immunoglobulin infusion had low PPVs for adjudicated diagnoses in Medicaid. Alternative data sources should be evaluated to study the epidemiology of these diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.