Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26271331›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2015

Learning before leaping: integration of an adaptive study design process prior to initiation of BetterBirth, a large-scale randomized controlled trial in Uttar Pradesh, India.

Lisa Ruth Hirschhorn, Katherine Semrau, Bhala Kodkany, Robyn Churchill, Atul Kapoor, Jonathan Spector, Steve Ringer, Rebecca Firestone, Vishwajeet Kumar, Atul Gawande

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02148952 nacompletednot on this map

A Matched-pair, Cluster Randomized Trial to Measure the Efficacy of the WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist Program on Severe Maternal, Fetal and Newborn Harm

TypeinterventionalSponsorHarvard School of Public Health (HSPH)Ran2014 to 2017Enrolled157,689ConditionsMaternal Death, Maternal Morbidity, Stillbirth, Neonatal DeathArmsWHO Safe Childbirth Checklist Program
NCT03263182 completednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Impact of the Safe Childbirth Checklist on Health Worker Childbirth Practices in Luapula Province of Zambia

TypeobservationalSponsorClinton Health Access Initiative Inc.Ran2017 to 2018Enrolled159ConditionsMaternal Death, Newborn DeathArmsIntroduction of the Safe Childbirth Checklist
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Impact of the WHO safe childbirth checklist on birth attendant behavior and maternal-newborn outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Interventions for promoting the initiation of breastfeeding.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Establishing usable innovations.Frontiers in health services · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lisa Ruth HirschhornAriadne Labs, Boston, MA, USA. lhirschhorn@ariadnelabs.org.
Katherine SemrauAriadne Labs, Boston, MA, USA. ksemrau@ariadnelabs.org.
Bhala KodkanyWomen's and Children's Health Research Unit, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Belgaum, Karnataka, India. rkodkany@gmail.com.
Robyn ChurchillAriadne Labs, Boston, MA, USA. robyncnm@gmail.com.
Atul KapoorPopulation Services International, Delhi, India. AKapoor@psi.org.in.
Jonathan SpectorLao Friends Hospital for Children, Luang Prabang, Lao People's Democratic Republic. specmonn@gmail.com.
Steve RingerDepartment of Neonatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. sringer@partners.org.
Rebecca FirestonePopulation Services International, Washington, DC, USA. RFirestone@psi.org.
Vishwajeet KumarCommunity Empowerment Labs, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India. vishwajeet.kumar@shivgarh.org.
Atul GawandeAriadne Labs, Boston, MA, USA. agawande@partners.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPragmatic and adaptive trial designs are increasingly used in quality improvement (QI) interventions to provide the strongest evidence for effective implementation and impact prior to broader scale-up. We previously showed that an on-site coaching intervention focused on the World Health Organization Safe Childbirth Checklist (SCC) improved performance of essential birth practices (EBPs) in one facility in Karnataka, India. We report on the process and outcomes of adapting the intervention prior to larger-scale implementation in a randomized controlled trial in Uttar Pradesh (UP), India.

methodsInitially, we trained a local team of physicians and nurses to coach birth attendants in SCC use at two public facilities for 4-6 weeks. Trained observers evaluated adherence to EBPs before and after coaching. Using mixed methods and a systematic adaptation process, we modified and strengthened the intervention. The modified intervention was implemented in three additional facilities. Pre/post-change in EBP prevalence aggregated across facilities was analyzed.

resultsIn the first two facilities, limited improvement was seen in EBPs with the exception of post-partum oxytocin. Checklists were used <25 % of observations. We identified challenges in physicians coaching nurses, need to engage district and facility leadership to address system gaps, and inadequate strategy for motivating SCC uptake. Revisions included change to peer-to-peer coaching (nurse to nurse, physician to physician); strengthened coach training on behavior and system change; adapted strategy for effective leadership engagement; and an explicit motivation strategy to enhance professional pride and effectiveness. These modifications resulted in improvement in multiple EBPs from baseline including taking maternal blood pressure (0 to 16 %), post-partum oxytocin (36 to 97 %), early breastfeeding initiation (3 to 64 %), as well as checklist use (range 32 to 88 %), all p < 0.01. Further adaptations were implemented to increase the effectiveness prior to full trial launch.

conclusionsThe adaptive study design of implementation, evaluation, and feedback drove iterative redesign and successfully developed a SCC-focused coaching intervention that improved EBPs in UP facilities. This work was critical to develop a replicable BetterBirth package tailored to the local context. The multi-center pragmatic trial is underway measuring impact of the BetterBirth program on EBP and maternal-neonatal morbidity and mortality.

trial registrationCLINICAL TRIALS IDENTIFIER: NCT02148952 .

Indexed as

Delivery, ObstetricChecklistFemaleHumansIndiaMidwiferyParturitionPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicPregnancyQuality ImprovementRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID26271331
PMCPMC4536663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.