Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26270944›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2015

Prescription contraception use: a cross-sectional population study of psychosocial determinants.

Gerard J Molloy, Leigh-Ann Sweeney, Molly Byrne, Carmel M Hughes, Roger Ingham, Karen Morgan, Andrew W Murphy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Women's perceptions of contraceptive efficacy and safety.Contraception and reproductive medicine · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Gerard J MolloySchool of Psychology, National University of Ireland, Galway, Republic of Ireland Whitaker Institute for Innovation and Societal Change, National University of Ireland, Galway, Republic of Ireland.
Leigh-Ann SweeneySchool of Psychology, National University of Ireland, Galway, Republic of Ireland Whitaker Institute for Innovation and Societal Change, National University of Ireland, Galway, Republic of Ireland.
Molly ByrneSchool of Psychology, National University of Ireland, Galway, Republic of Ireland Whitaker Institute for Innovation and Societal Change, National University of Ireland, Galway, Republic of Ireland.
Carmel M HughesSchool of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.
Roger InghamCentre for Sexual Health Research, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Karen MorganDepartment of Psychology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Republic of Ireland Perdana University Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland School of Medicine, Malaysia.
Andrew W MurphyDiscipline of General Practice, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway, Republic of Ireland.
Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway · IEQueen's University Belfast · GBRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IEUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMany forms of contraception are available on prescription only for example, the oral contraceptive pill (OCP) and long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs). In this analysis we aim to identify key determinants of prescription contraceptive use.

designCross-sectional population survey. Data on sociodemographic indices, concerns about the OCP and perceived barriers to access were collected.

settingData set constructed from a representative population-based telephone survey of community dwelling adults in the Republic of Ireland (RoI)

participants1515 women aged between 18 and 45 years

main outcome measureSelf-reported user of the OCP or LARCs (intrauterine contraception, contraceptive injections or subdermal contraceptive implants) in the previous 12 months.

resultsFor at least some of the previous year, 35% had used the OCP and 14% had used LARCs, while 3% had used two or more of these methods. OCP users were significantly younger, more likely to be unmarried and had higher income than non-users. Overall, 68% agreed with the statement 'that taking a break from long-term use of the contraceptive pill is a good idea' and 37% agreed with the statement that 'the OCP has dangerous side effects' and this was the strongest predictor variable of non-use of the OCP. Intrauterine contraception users were significantly older, more likely to be married and had lower income than non-users. Injections or subdermal contraceptive implant users were significantly younger, less likely to be married, had lower income and were less likely to agree that taking a break from long-term use of the pill is a good idea than non-users.

conclusionsPrescription contraceptive use is sociodemographically patterned, with LARCs in particular being associated with lower incomes in the RoI. Concerns about the safety of the OCP remain prevalent and are important and modifiable determinants of contraceptive-related behaviour.

Indexed as

Contraceptive Agents, FemaleAdolescentAdultContraception BehaviorContraceptive Devices, FemaleContraceptives, OralCross-Sectional StudiesDrug ImplantsFemaleHumansInjectionsInterviews as TopicIrelandMiddle AgedPrescription DrugsSocioeconomic FactorsContraceptive Agents, FemaleContraceptives, OralDrug ImplantsPrescription DrugsEPIDEMIOLOGYPUBLIC HEALTHSOCIAL MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID26270944
PMCPMC4538248
OpenAlexW2131552783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.