Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26270819›Full record

ArticlePLoS pathogens2015

Are Human Intestinal Eukaryotes Beneficial or Commensals?

Julius Lukeš, Christen Rune Stensvold, Kateřina Jirků-Pomajbíková, Laura Wegener Parfrey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS pathogens, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 112 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
112citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

112 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Molecular Detection ofMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Journal of medical microbiology · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Evolution and ecology of commensal gut protists: recent advances.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2025
    Article

52 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Julius LukešInstitute of Parasitology, Biology Centre, České Budějovice, Czech Republic; Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Toronto, Canada.
Christen Rune StensvoldStatens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kateřina Jirků-PomajbíkováInstitute of Parasitology, Biology Centre, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
Laura Wegener ParfreyCanadian Institute for Advanced Research, Toronto, Canada; Departments of Botany and Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

SymbiosisEukaryotaGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumans

Identifiers

PMID26270819
PMCPMC4536199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.