Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26270816›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Mechanisms that Trigger a Good Health-Care Response to Intimate Partner Violence in Spain. Combining Realist Evaluation and Qualitative Comparative Analysis Approaches.

Isabel Goicolea, Carmen Vives-Cases, Anna-Karin Hurtig, Bruno Marchal, Erica Briones-Vozmediano, Laura Otero-García, Marta García-Quinto, Miguel San Sebastian

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
12.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Intimate partner violence in Saudi Arabia: A topic of growing interest.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Isabel GoicoleaUnit of Epidemiology and Global Health, Department of Clinical Medicine and Public Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; Grupo de Investigación de Salud Pública, Universidad de Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
Carmen Vives-CasesGrupo de Investigación de Salud Pública, Universidad de Alicante, Alicante, Spain; Departamento de Enfermería Comunitaria, Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública e Historia de la Ciencia. Universidad de Alicante, Alicante, Spain; CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain.
Anna-Karin HurtigUnit of Epidemiology and Global Health, Department of Clinical Medicine and Public Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Bruno MarchalInstitute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Erica Briones-VozmedianoUnit of Epidemiology and Global Health, Department of Clinical Medicine and Public Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; Grupo de Investigación de Salud Pública, Universidad de Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
Laura Otero-GarcíaFaculty of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Marta García-QuintoGrupo de Investigación de Salud Pública, Universidad de Alicante, Alicante, Spain; Departamento de Enfermería Comunitaria, Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública e Historia de la Ciencia. Universidad de Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
Miguel San SebastianUnit of Epidemiology and Global Health, Department of Clinical Medicine and Public Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Umeå University · SEUniversity of Alicante · ESCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública · ESInstituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde · BEUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth care professionals, especially those working in primary health-care services, can play a key role in preventing and responding to intimate partner violence. However, there are huge variations in the way health care professionals and primary health care teams respond to intimate partner violence. In this study we tested a previously developed programme theory on 15 primary health care center teams located in four different Spanish regions: Murcia, C Valenciana, Castilla-León and Cantabria. The aim was to identify the key combinations of contextual factors and mechanisms that trigger a good primary health care center team response to intimate partner violence.

methodsA multiple case-study design was used. Qualitative and quantitative information was collected from each of the 15 centers (cases). In order to handle the large amount of information without losing familiarity with each case, qualitative comparative analysis was undertaken. Conditions (context and mechanisms) and outcomes, were identified and assessed for each of the 15 cases, and solution formulae were calculated using qualitative comparative analysis software.

resultsThe emerging programme theory highlighted the importance of the combination of each team's self-efficacy, perceived preparation and women-centredness in generating a good team response to intimate partner violence. The use of the protocol and accumulated experience in primary health care were the most relevant contextual/intervention conditions to trigger a good response. However in order to achieve this, they must be combined with other conditions, such as an enabling team climate, having a champion social worker and having staff with training in intimate partner violence.

conclusionsInterventions to improve primary health care teams' response to intimate partner violence should focus on strengthening team's self-efficacy, perceived preparation and the implementation of a woman-centred approach. The use of the protocol combined with a large working experience in primary health care, and other factors such as training, a good team climate, and having a champion social worker on the team, also played a key role. Measures to sustain such interventions and promote these contextual factors should be encouraged.

Indexed as

Intimate Partner ViolenceAttitude of Health PersonnelClinical CompetenceFemaleHumansMalePatient Care TeamPrimary Health CareSoftwareSpain

Identifiers

PMID26270816
PMCPMC4536036
OpenAlexW1960804825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.