Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26270558›Full record

Observational studyPrehospital emergency care2016

Accuracy of Prehospital Intravenous Fluid Volume Measurement by Emergency Medical Services.

Patrick J Coppler, Rajagopala Padmanabhan, Christian Martin-Gill, Clifton W Callaway, Donald M Yealy, Christopher W Seymour

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Prehospital emergency care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Patrick J Coppler
Rajagopala Padmanabhan
Christian Martin-Gill
Clifton W Callaway
Donald M Yealy
Christopher W Seymour

Funding

University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000005 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2012 to 2015
$50.8M
Pre-hospital identification of high-risk sepsisK23GM104022 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SEYMOUR, CHRISTOPHER WARREN · 2013 to 2016
$674k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000005NIGMS NIH HHS K23 GM104022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledPrehospital treatment protocols call for intravenous (IV) fluid for patients with shock, yet the measurement accuracy of administered fluid volume is unknown. The purpose of the current study was to assess the accuracy of documented and self-reported fluid volumes administered to medical patients by paramedics during prehospital care. We conducted a pilot, observational study nested within a parent cohort study of prehospital biomarkers in a single EMS agency transporting patients to a tertiary care hospital in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania over 8 months. Among eligible nontrauma, noncardiac arrest patients, we studied the self-reported IV fluid volume on ED arrival by paramedics, documented fluid volume in the EMS record, and compared those to the mass-derived fluid volume. We quantified the absolute error between methods, and determined EMS transport times or initial prehospital systolic blood pressure had any effect on error. We enrolled 50 patients who received prehospital IV fluid and had mass-derived fluid volume measured at ED arrival. Of these, 21 (42%) patients had IV fluid volume subsequently documented in EMS records. The median mass-derived fluid volume was 393 mL [IQR: 264-618 mL]. Mass-derived volume was similar for subjects who did (386 mL, IQR: 271-642 mL) or did not (399 mL, IQR: 253-602) have documented fluid administration (p > 0.05). The median self-reported fluid volume was 250 mL [IQR: 150-500 mL] and did not differ by documentation (p > 0.05). The median absolute error comparing self-reported to mass-derived fluid volume was 109 mL [IQR: 41-205 mL], and less than 250 mL in more than 80% of subjects. The median absolute error comparing documented fluid to mass-derived fluid volume was 142 mL [IQR: 64-265 mL], and was less than 250 mL in 71% of subjects. No difference in absolute error for either self-reported or document fluid volumes were modified by transport time or prehospital systolic blood pressure. Prehospital IV fluid administration is variably documented by EMS, and when recorded is typically within 250 mL of mass-derived fluid volume. KEY WORDS: emergency medical services; prehospital resuscitation; intravenous fluids; fluids.

Indexed as

AdultBiomarkersEmergency Medical ServicesFemaleFluid TherapyHumansInfusions, IntravenousMaleMedication ErrorsMiddle AgedPennsylvaniaPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesResuscitationShockSodium ChlorideBiomarkersSodium Chloride

Identifiers

PMID26270558
PMCPMC4701602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.