Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26270303›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of public health2015

Public Support for Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act Point-of-Sale Provisions: Results of a National Study.

Shyanika W Rose, Sherry L Emery, Susan Ennett, Heath Luz McNaughton Reyes, John C Scott, Kurt M Ribisl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Public Support for Cigarette Pack Pictorial Health Warnings Among US Adults: A Cross-sectional Analysis of the 2020 Health Information National Trends Survey.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Attitudes towards Potential New Tobacco Control Regulations among U.S. Adults.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shyanika W RoseAt the time of the study, Shyanika W. Rose, Susan Ennett, and Kurt M. Ribisl were with the Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, and the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Heath Luz McNaughton Reyes was with the Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health. Sherry L. Emery was with the Health Media Collaboratory, Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago. John C. Scott was with the Department of Public Policy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Sherry L EmeryAt the time of the study, Shyanika W. Rose, Susan Ennett, and Kurt M. Ribisl were with the Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, and the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Heath Luz McNaughton Reyes was with the Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health. Sherry L. Emery was with the Health Media Collaboratory, Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago. John C. Scott was with the Department of Public Policy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Susan EnnettAt the time of the study, Shyanika W. Rose, Susan Ennett, and Kurt M. Ribisl were with the Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, and the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Heath Luz McNaughton Reyes was with the Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health. Sherry L. Emery was with the Health Media Collaboratory, Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago. John C. Scott was with the Department of Public Policy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Heath Luz McNaughton ReyesAt the time of the study, Shyanika W. Rose, Susan Ennett, and Kurt M. Ribisl were with the Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, and the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Heath Luz McNaughton Reyes was with the Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health. Sherry L. Emery was with the Health Media Collaboratory, Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago. John C. Scott was with the Department of Public Policy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
John C ScottAt the time of the study, Shyanika W. Rose, Susan Ennett, and Kurt M. Ribisl were with the Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, and the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Heath Luz McNaughton Reyes was with the Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health. Sherry L. Emery was with the Health Media Collaboratory, Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago. John C. Scott was with the Department of Public Policy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Kurt M RibislAt the time of the study, Shyanika W. Rose, Susan Ennett, and Kurt M. Ribisl were with the Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, and the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Heath Luz McNaughton Reyes was with the Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health. Sherry L. Emery was with the Health Media Collaboratory, Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago. John C. Scott was with the Department of Public Policy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Funding

LINEBERGER CANCER CONTROL EDUCATION PROGRAMR25CA057726 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI EARP, JO ANNE L, RIBISL, KURT M. · 1992 to 2016
$8.0M
Tobacco Control in a Rapidly Changing Media EnvironmentU01CA154254 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI EMERY, SHERRY L · 2011 to 2015
$7.7M
Maximizing state & local policies to restrict tobacco marketing at point of saleU01CA154281 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HENRIKSEN, LISA ANNE, LUKE, DOUGLAS A · 2011 to 2015
$6.3M
NCI NIH HHS R25 CA057726NCI NIH HHS R25 CA57726NCI NIH HHS U01 CA154254NCI NIH HHS U01 CA154281
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe assessed public and smoker support for enacted and potential point-of-sale (POS) tobacco-control policies under the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act.

methodsWe surveyed a US nationally representative sample of 17, 507 respondents (6595 smokers) in January through February 2013, and used linear regression to calculate weighted point estimates and identify factors associated with support for POS policies among adults and smokers.

resultsOverall, nonsmokers were more supportive than were smokers. Regardless of smoking status, African Americans, Hispanics, women, and those of older ages were more supportive than White, male, and younger respondents, respectively. Policy support varied by provision. More than 80% of respondents supported minors' access restrictions and more than 45% supported graphic warnings. Support was lowest for plain packaging (23%), black-and-white advertising (26%), and a ban on menthol cigarettes (36%).

conclusionsPublic support for marketing and POS provisions is low relative to other areas of tobacco control. Tobacco-control advocates and the Food and Drug Administration should build on existing levels of public support to promote and maintain evidence-based, but controversial, policy changes in the retail environment.

Indexed as

Family HealthPublic OpinionSmoking PreventionAdultFemaleHumansMaleMarketingMiddle AgedSmokingSmoking CessationUnited States

Identifiers

PMID26270303
PMCPMC4566565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.