Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26270251›Full record

ArticleJAMA ophthalmology2015

Association of compounded bevacizumab with postinjection endophthalmitis.

Brian L VanderBeek, Sarah G Bonaffini, Liyuan Ma

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA ophthalmology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Brian L VanderBeekScheie Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia2Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman S.
Sarah G Bonaffinicurrently a medical student at Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Bradenton, Florida.
Liyuan MaLeonard Davis Institute, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia.
Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine · USPenn Presbyterian Medical Center · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

PENN Vision Clinical Scientist ProgramK12EY015398 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI JOSHUA L DUNAIEF · 2004 to 2026
$11.7M
NEI NIH HHS K12 EY015398NEI NIH HHS K12-EY015398
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceCurrent draft guidelines set forth by the US Food and Drug Administration for compounded or repackaged medications would greatly limit the availability and use of bevacizumab by ophthalmologists across the country. Little evidence beyond highly publicized case reports exists for or against the need for additional regulation of compounded bevacizumab.

objectiveTo determine whether the distribution of bevacizumab through compounding pharmacies increases the risk for endophthalmitis compared with the distribution of single-use vials of ranibizumab from the manufacturer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsA retrospective cohort study using medical claims data from ambulatory care centers across the United States that were submitted to a large, national US insurer. Cohorts were created using information on 530 382 intravitreal injections administered from January 1, 2005, through December 31, 2012. Any individual from this data set who received an intravitreal injection of bevacizumab or ranibizumab (n=383 810) and had at least 6 months of data before and 1 month after the injection was eligible. After exclusions (any previous diagnosis of endophthalmitis, multiple injected drugs given on the index day, or intraocular surgery within 15 days of the injection or between the injection and a diagnosis of endophthalmitis), our analysis involved 383 810 intravitreal injections given to 58 612 patients. Data collection and analysis occurred from February 16 through April 7, 2015. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The odds of developing endophthalmitis after an intravitreal injection of bevacizumab compared with ranibizumab.

resultsIn total, 296 565 injections of bevacizumab were given to 51 116 patients and 87 245 injections of ranibizumab were given to 7496 patients. We found 71 cases of endophthalmitis (49 in the bevacizumab cohort and 22 in the ranibizumab cohort) for an endophthalmitis rate of 0.017% (95% CI, 0.012%-0.021%; 1 case per 6061 injections) for bevacizumab and 0.025% (95% CI, 0.015%-0.036%; 1 case per 3968 injections) for ranibizumab. After controlling for age, race, sex, injection-related diagnosis, and year of injection, we found no significant association with development of endophthalmitis after a bevacizumab injection compared with ranibizumab (odds ratio, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.39-1.09]; P = .11). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The results of this study suggest bevacizumab as currently used across the United States does not increase the risk for endophthalmitis; therefore, additional regulations on the use of repackaged bevacizumab may be unnecessary.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAngiogenesis InhibitorsBevacizumabDatabases, FactualDrug CompoundingDrug PackagingEndophthalmitisEye Infections, BacterialFemaleHumansIntravitreal InjectionsLegislation, DrugMaleOdds RatioRetinal DiseasesAngiogenesis InhibitorsBevacizumabVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVEGFA protein, human

Identifiers

PMID26270251
PMCPMC4600036
OpenAlexW1588519937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.