Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26269776›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2015

Optimization of the enhanced permeability and retention effect for near-infrared imaging of solid tumors with indocyanine green.

Jack X Jiang, Jane J Keating, Elizabeth M De Jesus, Ryan P Judy, Brian Madajewski, Ollin Venegas, Olugbenga T Okusanya, Sunil Singhal

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed, 145 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Actionable Feedback on Signal-to-Background Ratios During Drop-in Radioguided Surgery.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jack X JiangDepartment of Surgery, Division of Thoracic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Jane J KeatingDepartment of Surgery, Division of Thoracic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Elizabeth M De JesusDepartment of Surgery, Division of Thoracic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Ryan P JudyDepartment of Surgery, Division of Thoracic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Brian MadajewskiDepartment of Surgery, Division of Thoracic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Ollin VenegasDepartment of Surgery, Division of Thoracic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Olugbenga T OkusanyaDepartment of Surgery, Division of Thoracic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Sunil SinghalDepartment of Surgery, Division of Thoracic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgery is the most effective method to cure patients with solid tumors. New techniques in near-infrared (NIR) cancer imaging are being used to identify surgical margins and residual tumor cells in the wound. Our goal was to determine the optimal time and dose for imaging solid tumors using Indocyanine Green. Syngeneic murine flank tumor models were used to test NIR imaging of ICG at various doses ranging from 0 to 10 mg/kg. Imaging was performed immediately after injection and up to 72 hours later. Biodistribution in the blood and murine organs were quantified by spectroscopy and fluorescence microscopy. Based on these results, a six patient dose titration study was performed. In murine flank tumors, the tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) for ICG at doses less than 5 mg/kg were less than 2 fold at all time points, and the surgeons could not subjectively identify tissue contrast. However, for doses ranging from 5 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg, the TBR ranged from 2.1 to 8.0. The tumor signal was best appreciated at 24 hours and the background was least pronounced after 24 hours. Biodistribution studies in the blood and murine organs revealed excretion through the biliary tree and gastrointestinal tract, with minimal blood fluorescence at the higher doses. A follow up pilot study confirmed that these findings were applicable to lung cancer patients, and tumor was clearly delineated from surrounding normal tissue by NIR imaging. For non-hepatic solid tumors, we found ICG was optimal when dosed at 5 mg/kg and 24 hours before surgery.

Indexed as

CancerfluorescenceICGimagingindocyaninesurgery

Identifiers

PMID26269776
PMCPMC4529592
OpenAlexW2402860179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.