Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26269704›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in zoology2015

The role of stripe orientation in target capture success.

Anna E Hughes, Richard S Magor-Elliott, Martin Stevens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in zoology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Dazzle camouflage: benefits and problems revealed.Royal Society open science · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. How camouflage works.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Dazzle camouflage, target tracking, and the confusion effect.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
  10. Camouflaging moving objects: crypsis and masquerade.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anna E HughesDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Richard S Magor-ElliottDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Martin StevensCentre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Cornwall, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G022887/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction'Motion dazzle' refers to the hypothesis that high contrast patterns such as stripes and zigzags may have evolved in a wide range of animals as they make it difficult to judge the trajectory of an animal in motion. Despite recent research into this idea, it is still unclear to what extent stripes interfere with motion judgement and if effects are seen, what visual processes might underlie them. We use human participants performing a touch screen task in which they attempt to 'catch' moving targets in order to determine whether stripe orientation affects capture success, as previous research has suggested that different stripe orientations may be processed differently by the visual system. We also ask whether increasing the number of targets presented in a trial can affect capture success, as previous research has suggested that motion dazzle effects may be larger in groups.

resultsWhen single targets were presented sequentially within each trial, we find that perpendicular and oblique striped targets are captured at a similar rate to uniform grey targets, but parallel striped targets are significantly easier to capture. However, when multiple targets are present simultaneously during a trial we find that striped targets are captured in fewer attempts and more quickly than grey targets.

conclusionsOur results suggest that there may be differences in capture success based on target pattern orientation, perhaps suggesting that different visual mechanisms are involved in processing of parallel stripes compared to perpendicular/oblique stripes. However, these results do not seem to generalise to trials with multiple targets, and contrary to previous predictions, striped targets appear to be easier to capture when multiple targets are present compared to being presented individually. These results suggest that the different orientations of stripes seen on animals in nature (such as in fish and snakes) may serve different purposes, and that it is unclear whether motion dazzle effects may have greater benefits for animals living in groups.

Indexed as

Animal colorationCamouflageMotion dazzleMotion perceptionVisual illusions

Identifiers

PMID26269704
PMCPMC4533824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.