Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26269616›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2015

Comparison between Flow Cytometry, Microscopy, and Lactate Dehydrogenase-Based Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Plasmodium falciparum Drug Susceptibility Testing under Field Conditions.

Charles J Woodrow, Chirapat Wangsing, Kanlaya Sriprawat, Peter R Christensen, Francois Nosten, Laurent Rénia, Bruce Russell, Benoît Malleret

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Charles J WoodrowCentre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chirapat WangsingShoklo Malaria Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Tak, Thailand.
Kanlaya SriprawatShoklo Malaria Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Tak, Thailand.
Peter R ChristensenShoklo Malaria Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Tak, Thailand.
Francois NostenCentre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom Shoklo Malaria Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Tak, Thailand.
Laurent RéniaSingapore Immunology Network (SIgN), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Biopolis, Singapore.
Bruce RussellDepartment of Microbiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Benoît MalleretSingapore Immunology Network (SIgN), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Biopolis, Singapore Department of Microbiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore benoit_malleret@immunol.a-star.edu.sg.
Mahidol University · THAgency for Science, Technology and Research · SGMahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit · THNational University Health System · SGNational University of Singapore · SGUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flow cytometry is an objective method for conducting in vitro antimalarial sensitivity assays with increasing potential for application in field sites. We examined in vitro susceptibility to seven anti-malarial drugs for 40 fresh P. falciparum field isolates via a flow cytometry method (FCM), a colorimetric LDH-based ELISA : DELI), and standard microscopic slide analysis of growth. For FCM, 184/280 (66%) assays met analytical acceptance criteria, compared to 166/280 (59%) for DELI. There was good agreement between FCM and microscopy, while DELI tended to produce higher half-maximal inhibition constants (IC50s) than FCM, with an overall bias of 2.2-fold (Bland-Altman comparison). Values for artesunate and dihydroartemisinin were most affected. Paradoxical increases in signal at very high concentrations of mefloquine and related compounds were more marked with the DELI assay, suggesting that off-target effects on LDH production may be responsible. Loss of FCM signal due to reinvasion or slow growth was observed in a small number of samples. These results extend previous work on use of flow cytometry to determine antimalarial susceptibility in terms of the number of samples, range of drugs, and comparison with other methods.

Indexed as

AntimalarialsColorimetryEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFlow CytometryHumansInhibitory Concentration 50L-Lactate DehydrogenaseMicroscopyParasitic Sensitivity TestsPlasmodium falciparumAntimalarialsL-Lactate Dehydrogenase

Identifiers

PMID26269616
PMCPMC4572553
OpenAlexW2173323569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.