ArticleAnnals of dyslexia2015
Risk and protective factors in gifted children with dyslexia.
Article in Annals of dyslexia, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Literacy Profiles in Twice-Exceptional Preadolescents with Intellectual Giftedness and Dyslexia.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Reading and Writing Profiles in Twice-Exceptional Adolescents with Intellectual Giftedness and Dyslexia.Journal of Intelligence · 2026Article
- Cognitive and Reading Profiles of Gifted Students with Learning Disabilities: Implications for Assessment and Identification.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Resilience research in learning disabilities: Guiding principles from developmental psychopathology.Learning and instruction · 2025Article
- Do gifted children without specific learning disabilities read more efficiently than typically developing children?Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Developmental Trajectory of Depressive Symptoms from Early Childhood through High School in Children and Adolescents with a High Intellectual Potential.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- Revisiting Multifactor Models of Dyslexia: Do They Fit Empirical Data and What Are Their Implications for Intervention?Brain sciences · 2023Article
- In Search of Cognitive Promotive and Protective Factors for Word Reading.Scientific studies of reading : the official journal of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading · 2021Article
- Early and late diagnosed dyslexia in secondary school: Performance on literacy skills and cognitive correlates.Dyslexia (Chichester, England) · 2020Article
- Short Forms of Wechsler Scales Assessing the Intellectually Gifted Children Using Simulation Data.Frontiers in psychology · 2018Article
- Identifying Dyslexia Risk in Student-Athletes: A Preliminary Protocol for Concussion Management.Journal of athletic training · 2017Article
- Foreign language reading and spelling in gifted students with dyslexia in secondary education.Reading and writing · 2017Article
- Improving the Measures of Phonological Ability in the Russian Language: IRT and CART Modeling Application.Reading research quarterlyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated risk and protective factors associated with dyslexia and literacy development, both at the group and individual level, to gain more insight in underlying cognitive profiles and possibilities for compensation in high-IQ children. A sample of 73 Dutch primary school children included a dyslexic group, a gifted-dyslexic group, and a borderline-dyslexic group (i.e., gifted children with relative literacy problems). Children were assessed on literacy, phonology, language, and working memory. Competing hypotheses were formulated, comparing the core-deficit view to the twice-exceptionality view on compensation with giftedness-related strengths. The results showed no indication of compensation of dyslexia-related deficits by giftedness-related strengths in gifted children with dyslexia. The higher literacy levels of borderline children compared to gifted children with dyslexia seemed the result of both fewer combinations of risk factors and less severe phonological deficits in this group. There was no evidence for compensation by specific strengths more relevant to literacy development in the borderline group. Accordingly, the findings largely supported the core-deficit view, whereas no evidence for the twice-exceptionality view was found. Besides practical implications, the findings also add to knowledge about the different manifestations of dyslexia and associated underlying cognitive factors at the higher end of the intelligence spectrum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.