Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26269228›Full record

ReviewNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2015

Safety and Toxicology of Cannabinoids.

Jane Sachs, Erin McGlade, Deborah Yurgelun-Todd

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. CBClinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Use of oral neuromodulators in chronic pelvic painNumber 8 - 2025.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Should oncologists trust cannabinoids?Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Applications ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jane SachsDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Utah, 383 Colorow Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA. jane.sachs@utah.edu.
Erin McGladeDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Utah, 383 Colorow Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
Deborah Yurgelun-ToddDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Utah, 383 Colorow Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is extensive research on the safety, toxicology, potency, and therapeutic potential of cannabis. However, uncertainty remains facilitating continued debate on medical and recreational cannabis policies at the state and federal levels. This review will include a brief description of cannabinoids and the endocannabinoid system; a summary of the acute and long-term effects of cannabis; and a discussion of the therapeutic potential of cannabis. The conclusions about safety and efficacy will then be compared with the current social and political climate to suggest future policy directions and general guidelines.

Indexed as

Health PolicyToxicologyAnimalsCannabinoidsCannabisHumansMarijuana AbuseCannabinoidsCannabisCannabis efficacyCannabis policyCannabis safety

Identifiers

PMID26269228
PMCPMC4604177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.