Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26269176›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2015

Structures of Coxsackievirus A16 Capsids with Native Antigenicity: Implications for Particle Expansion, Receptor Binding, and Immunogenicity.

Jingshan Ren, Xiangxi Wang, Ling Zhu, Zhongyu Hu, Qiang Gao, Pan Yang, Xuemei Li, Junzhi Wang, Xinliang Shen, Elizabeth E Fry and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Jingshan RenDivision of Structural Biology, University of Oxford, The Henry Wellcome Building for Genomic Medicine, Headington, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Xiangxi WangNational Laboratory of Macromolecules, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing, China.
Ling ZhuDivision of Structural Biology, University of Oxford, The Henry Wellcome Building for Genomic Medicine, Headington, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Zhongyu HuNational Institutes for Food and Drug Control, No. 2, Tiantan Xili, Beijing, China.
Qiang GaoNational Laboratory of Macromolecules, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing, China Sinovac Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China.
Pan YangNational Laboratory of Macromolecules, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing, China.
Xuemei LiNational Laboratory of Macromolecules, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing, China.
Junzhi WangNational Institutes for Food and Drug Control, No. 2, Tiantan Xili, Beijing, China.
Xinliang ShenNational Vaccine and Serum Institute, Beijing, China.
Elizabeth E FryDivision of Structural Biology, University of Oxford, The Henry Wellcome Building for Genomic Medicine, Headington, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Zihe RaoNational Laboratory of Macromolecules, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing, China Laboratory of Structural Biology, School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China raozh@xtal.tsinghua.edu.cn dave@strubi.ox.ac.uk.
David I StuartDivision of Structural Biology, University of Oxford, The Henry Wellcome Building for Genomic Medicine, Headington, Oxford, United Kingdom Diamond Light Sources, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, United Kingdom raozh@xtal.tsinghua.edu.cn dave@strubi.ox.ac.uk.
Institute of Biophysics · CNCentre for Human Genetics · GBNational Institutes for Food and Drug Control · CNDiamond Light Source · GBNational Vaccine and Serum Institute · CNSinovac Biotech · CNTsinghua University · CNUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G1000099Medical Research Council G1100525Medical Research Council MR/N00065X/1Wellcome Trust 075491/Z/04Wellcome Trust 090532
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledEnterovirus 71 (EV71) and coxsackievirus A16 (CVA16) are the primary causes of the epidemics of hand-foot-and-mouth disease (HFMD) that affect more than a million children in China each year and lead to hundreds of deaths. Although there has been progress with vaccines for EV71, the development of a CVA16 vaccine has proved more challenging, and the EV71 vaccine does not give useful cross-protection, despite the capsid proteins of the two viruses sharing about 80% sequence identity. The structural details of the expanded forms of the capsids, which possess nonnative antigenicity, are now well understood, but high resolution information for the native antigenic form of CVA16 has been missing. Here, we remedy this with high resolution X-ray structures of both mature and natural empty CVA16 particles and also of empty recombinant viruslike particles of CVA16 produced in insect cells, a potential vaccine antigen. All three structures are unexpanded native particles and antigenically identical. The recombinant particles have recruited a lipid moiety to stabilize the native antigenic state that is different from the one used in a natural virus infection. As expected, the mature CVA16 virus is similar to EV71; however, structural and immunogenic comparisons highlight differences that may have implications for vaccine production. IMPORTANCE: Hand-foot-and-mouth disease is a serious public health threat to children in Asian-Pacific countries, resulting in millions of cases. EV71 and CVA16 are the two dominant causative agents of the disease that, while usually mild, can cause severe neurological complications, leading to hundreds of deaths. EV71 vaccines do not provide protection against CVA16. A CVA16 vaccine or bivalent EV71/CVA16 vaccine is therefore urgently needed. We report atomic structures for the mature CVA16 virus, a natural empty particle, and a recombinant CVA16 virus-like particle that does not contain the viral genome. All three particles have similar structures and identical antigenicity. The recombinant particles, produced in insect cells (a system suitable for making vaccine antigen), are stabilized by recruiting from the insect cells a small molecule that is different from that used by the virus in a normal infection. We present structural and immunogenic comparisons with EV71 to facilitate structure-based drug design and vaccine development.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, NeutralizingAntigens, ViralBaculoviridaeCapsidCapsid ProteinsChlorocebus aethiopsCrystallography, X-RayEnterovirusEnterovirus A, HumanGene ExpressionHumansMiceMice, Inbred BALB CAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, NeutralizingAntigens, ViralCapsid ProteinsRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26269176
PMCPMC4580203
OpenAlexW1955329737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.