Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26269131›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2016

Patients' Satisfaction with and Preference for Telehealth Visits.

Jennifer M Polinski, Tobias Barker, Nancy Gagliano, Andrew Sussman, Troyen A Brennan, William H Shrank

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 284 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
284citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

284 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

224 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jennifer M PolinskiCVS Health, 100 Scenic View Drive, #121130, Woonsocket, RI, 02864, USA. jennifer.polinski@cvscaremark.com.
Tobias BarkerCVS Health, 100 Scenic View Drive, #121130, Woonsocket, RI, 02864, USA.
Nancy GaglianoCVS Health, 100 Scenic View Drive, #121130, Woonsocket, RI, 02864, USA.
Andrew SussmanCVS Health, 100 Scenic View Drive, #121130, Woonsocket, RI, 02864, USA.
Troyen A BrennanCVS Health, 100 Scenic View Drive, #121130, Woonsocket, RI, 02864, USA.
William H ShrankCVS Health, 100 Scenic View Drive, #121130, Woonsocket, RI, 02864, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOne-quarter of U.S. patients do not have a primary care provider or do not have complete access to one. Work and personal responsibilities also compete with finding convenient, accessible care. Telehealth services facilitate patients' access to care, but whether patients are satisfied with telehealth is unclear.

objectiveWe assessed patients' satisfaction with and preference for telehealth visits in a telehealth program at CVS MinuteClinics.

designCross-sectional patient satisfaction survey.

participantsPatients were aged ≥18 years, presented at a MinuteClinic offering telehealth in January-September 2014, had symptoms suitable for telehealth consultation, and agreed to a telehealth visit when the on-site practitioner was busy. MAIN MEASURES: Patients reported their age, gender, and whether they had health insurance and/or a primary care provider. Patients rated their satisfaction with seeing diagnostic images, hearing and seeing the remote practitioner, the assisting on-site nurse's capability, quality of care, convenience, and overall understanding. Patients ranked telehealth visits compared to traditional ones: better (defined as preferring telehealth), just as good (defined as liking telehealth), or worse. Predictors of preferring or liking telehealth were assessed via multivariate logistic regression. KEY

resultsIn total, 1734 (54 %) of 3303 patients completed the survey: 70 % were women, and 41 % had no usual place of care. Between 94 and 99 % reported being "very satisfied" with all telehealth attributes. One-third preferred a telehealth visit to a traditional in-person visit. An additional 57 % liked telehealth. Lack of medical insurance increased the odds of preferring telehealth (OR = 0.83, 95 % CI, 0.72-0.97). Predictors of liking telehealth were female gender (OR = 1.68, 1.04-2.72) and being very satisfied with their overall understanding of telehealth (OR = 2.76, 1.84-4.15), quality of care received (OR = 2.34, 1.42-3.87), and telehealth's convenience (OR = 2.87, 1.09-7.94)

conclusionsPatients reported high satisfaction with their telehealth experience. Convenience and perceived quality of care were important to patients, suggesting that telehealth may facilitate access to care.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient PreferencePatient SatisfactionPilot ProjectsTelemedicineYoung Adultaccess to carepatient satisfactiontelehealth

Identifiers

PMID26269131
PMCPMC4762824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.