Observational studyRadiation oncology (London, England)2015
French multicentre clinical evaluation of helical TomoTherapy for anal cancer in a cohort of 64 consecutive patients.
Observational study in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic review of outcome measures following chemoradiotherapy for the treatment of anal cancer (CORMAC).Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2018Pooled it
- Intensity modulated radiotherapy for anal canal squamous cell carcinoma: A 16-year single institution experience.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PURPOSE/
objectivesTo assess feasibility and toxicity of Helical TomoTherapy for treating anal cancer patients.
methodsFrom 2007 to 2011, 64 patients were consecutively treated with TomoTherapy in three centres for locally advanced squamous-cell anal carcinoma (T2 > 4 cm or N positive). Prescribed doses were 45 Gy to the pelvis including inguinal nodes and 59.4 Gy to the primary site and involved nodes with fractions of 1.8 Gy, five days a week. A positional Megavoltage Computed Tomography was performed before each treatment session. All acute and late toxicities were graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method.
resultsMedian follow-up was 22.9 months. Fifty-four women and 10 men were treated (median age: 62 years). Nineteen patients (29.7%) had T2, 16 patients (25.0%) T3, and 27 patients (42.2%) T4 tumours. Thirty-nine patients (60.9%) had nodal involvement. Median tumour size was 45 mm (range, 10-110 mm). Seven patients had a colostomy before treatment initiation. Fifty-seven patients received concomitant chemotherapy (5-FU/cisplatin or 5-FU/mitomycin-based therapy). Forty-seven patients (73.4 %) experienced a complete response, 13 a partial response or local recurrence, and 11 had salvage surgery; among these, six became complete responders, three experienced metastatic failure, and two local failure. At least four patients experienced metastatic recurrence (concomitant to a local failure for one patient). The two-year overall survival was 85.6% (95 %CI [71.1%-93.0%]), and the one-year disease-free survival, and colostomy-free survival were 68.7% (95 %CI [54.4%-79.4]), and 75.5% (95 %CI [60.7%-85.3%]) respectively. Overall survival, disease-free survival and colostomy free-survival were significantly better for women than men (p = 0.002, p = 0.004, and p = 0.002 respectively). Acute grade ≥3 toxicity included dermatologic (46.9% of patients), gastrointestinal (20.3%), and hematologic (17.2%) toxicity. Acute grade 4 hematologic toxicity occurred in one patient. No grade 5 event was observed.
conclusionsTomoTherapy for locally advanced anal cancer is feasible. In our three centres of expertise, this technique appeared to produce few acute gastrointestinal toxicities. However, high rates of dermatologic toxicity were observed. The therapeutic efficacy was within the range of expectations and similar to previous studies in accordance with the high rates of locally advanced tumours and nodal involvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.