Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26268809›Full record

ArticleBMC neuroscience2015

The effects of preferential A- and C-fibre blocks and T-type calcium channel antagonist on detection of low-force monofilaments in healthy human participants.

Saad S Nagi, James S Dunn, Ingvars Birznieks, Richard M Vickery, David A Mahns

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Saad S NagiSchool of Medicine, University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia. S.Nagi@uws.edu.au.
James S DunnSchool of Medicine, University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia. James.Dunn@uws.edu.au.
Ingvars BirznieksNeuroscience Research Australia, PO Box 1165, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia. I.Birznieks@unsw.edu.au.
Richard M VickerySchool of Medical Sciences, UNSW Australia, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia. Richard.Vickery@unsw.edu.au.
David A MahnsSchool of Medicine, University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia. D.Mahns@uws.edu.au.
Western Sydney University · AUUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA myriad of studies have argued that tactile sensibility is underpinned exclusively by large myelinated mechanoreceptors. However, the functional significance of their slow-conducting counterparts, termed C-low threshold mechanoreceptors (C-LTMRs), remains largely unexplored. We recently showed the emergence of brush- and vibration-evoked allodynia in human hairy and glabrous skin during background muscle pain. The allodynia persisted following the preferential blockade of myelinated fibres but was abolished by the preferential blockade of cutaneous C fibres, thereby suggesting a pathway involving hairy skin C-LTMRs and their functional counterparts in glabrous skin in this phenomenon. In the present study, we tested the effects of preferential A- and C-fibre conduction blocks and pharmacological blockade of T-type calcium channel Cav3.2 (expressed selectively on small-fibre LTMRs) on monofilament detection thresholds in healthy participants by compression, low-dose intradermal anaesthesia (xylocaine 0.25 %) and selective T-channel antagonist, TTA-A2.

resultsWe found that all participants could detect monofilament contacts (as low as 1.6 mN) within the innocuous tactile range regardless of the preferential blockade of myelinated fibres. Furthermore, during the compression block no subject reported a switch in modality from touch to pain. That is, the low-force monofilament contacts were always perceived as non-painful. However, there was a small but significant elevation of monofilament thresholds (~2 mN) in the glabrous skin following the compression block. Importantly, no differences were found in the thresholds across hairy and glabrous regions while the myelinated fibres were conducting or not. The preferential blockade of C fibres in the glabrous skin (with myelinated fibres intact) also resulted in a small but significant elevation of tactile thresholds. Furthermore, the use of T-channel blocker in the glabrous skin during compression block of myelinated fibres resulted in complete abolition of monofilament sensibility within the innocuous tactile range (tested up to ~20 mN).

conclusionsThese observations suggest that C-LTMRs need not be regarded as a redundant tactile system, but appear to complement normal large-myelinated-fibre tactile function. Convergent findings in glabrous and hairy skin lend support for an underlying system of innocuous mechanoreception with Cav3.2-expressing unmyelinated fibres.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBenzeneacetamidesCalcium Channel BlockersCalcium Channels, T-TypeFemaleHandHumansLidocaineMaleMechanoreceptorsNerve BlockPain PerceptionPhysical StimulationPyridinesSensory Thresholds2-(4-cyclopropylphenyl)-N-(1-(5-((2,2,2-trifluoroethyl)oxo)pyridin-2-yl)ethyl)acetamideBenzeneacetamidesCACNA1H protein, humanCalcium Channel BlockersCalcium Channels, T-TypeLidocainePyridinesVoltage-Gated Sodium Channel Blockers

Identifiers

PMID26268809
PMCPMC4535530
OpenAlexW1857325846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.