Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26268431›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2015

Sudden insight is associated with shutting out visual inputs.

Carola Salvi, Emanuela Bricolo, Steven L Franconeri, John Kounios, Mark Beeman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. The white matter of Aha! moments.BMC psychology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Eliciting false insights with semantic priming.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Carola SalviDepartment of Psychology, Milano-Bicocca University, Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo, 1, 20126, Milano, Italy. c.salvi4@campus.unimib.it.
Emanuela BricoloDepartment of Psychology, Milano-Bicocca University, Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo, 1, 20126, Milano, Italy.
Steven L FranconeriDepartment of Psychology and Cognitive Brain Mapping Group, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
John KouniosDepartment of Psychology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Mark BeemanDepartment of Psychology and Cognitive Brain Mapping Group, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Creative ideas seem often to appear when we close our eyes, stare at a blank wall, or gaze out of a window--all signs of shutting out distractions and turning attention inward. Prior research has demonstrated that attention-related brain areas are differently active when people solve problems with sudden insight (the Aha! phenomenon), relative to deliberate, analytic solving. We directly investigated the relationship between attention deployment and problem solving by recording eye movements and blinks, which are overt indicators of attention, as people solved short, visually presented problems. In the preparation period, before problems eventually solved by insight, participants blinked more frequently and longer, and made fewer fixations, than before problems eventually solved by analysis. Immediately prior to solutions, participants blinked longer and looked away from the problem more often when solving by insight than when solving analytically. These phenomena extend prior research with a direct demonstration of dynamic differences in attention as people solve problems with sudden insight versus analytically.

Indexed as

CreativityAdultAttentionEye MovementsFemaleHumansMaleProblem SolvingVisual PerceptionYoung AdultCognitive neuroscienceCreativityEye movementsProblem solvingVisual attention

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.