Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26268142›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2015

Quantified ultrasound elastography in the assessment of cutaneous carcinoma.

Bahar Dasgeb, Michael A Morris, Darius Mehregan, Eliot L Siegel

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. High-frequency ultrasound for differentiation between high-risk basal cell carcinoma and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Elastography reference values of facial skin elasticity.Postepy dermatologii i alergologii · 2019
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bahar Dasgeb1 Department of Medicine Dermatology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), New York, NY, USA.
Michael A Morris3 Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Darius Mehregan5 Department of Dermatology, Wayne State University, Dearborn, MI, USA.
Eliot L Siegel3 Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA.
University of Maryland, Baltimore · USNational Institutes of Health · USWayne State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the feasibility of high-frequency ultrasound and ultrasound elastography (USE) in discriminating benign from malignant skin lesions in a prospective cohort study and to introduce the use of a "strain ratio" for evaluation of skin lesions.

methodsA commercial ultrasound system with a 14-MHz transducer was used to visualize skin lesions requiring biopsy on clinical evaluation. Anatomic ultrasound and USE imaging of the skin lesions was performed using 2- to 4-mm gel stand-off pads. A region of interest was manually selected over the area of each lesion with the lowest strain. The concept of a strain ratio of the compressibility of the normal skin at the corresponding layer to that of the least compressible region of a lesion in question was created and applied. This ratio was subsequently correlated with blind histopathological evaluation for malignancy.

results55 patients were included in the study with a total of 67 lesions evaluated. 29 lesions were malignant and 38 benign. All malignant lesions had strain ratios ≥3.9. All benign lesions had strain ratios ≤3.0. A diagnostic value between 3.0 and 3.9 would result in 100% sensitivity and specificity in the characterization of these lesions as malignant.

conclusionThis pilot study demonstrated that USE plus strain ratio appears to be a promising modality in providing diagnostic determination between cancerous and benign primary solitary skin lesions prior to biopsy. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This is the first reported study applying an original mathematical elastographic ratio, or strain ratio, to evaluate primary solitary skin lesions.

Indexed as

Elasticity Imaging TechniquesAdultCohort StudiesDiagnosis, DifferentialFeasibility StudiesHumansProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificitySkin Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID26268142
PMCPMC4730976
OpenAlexW1896741938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.