Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26267701›Full record

ReviewHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2015

Review on the effects of influenza vaccination during pregnancy on preterm births.

Marta C Nunes, Shabir A Madhi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marta C Nunesa Medical Research Council: Respiratory and Meningeal Pathogens Research Unit ; University of the Witwatersrand ; Johannesburg , South Africa.
Shabir A Madhia Medical Research Council: Respiratory and Meningeal Pathogens Research Unit ; University of the Witwatersrand ; Johannesburg , South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pregnant women are considered to be susceptible to severe influenza illness and are recommended as a priority group to be targeted for influenza vaccination in countries with vaccination programs. Increased rates of poor birth outcomes have also been temporally associated with influenza infection, especially when pandemics strains emerge. Even though the primary purpose for influenza vaccination during pregnancy is to decrease the risk of influenza infection in the women, other potential benefits include protection of their young infants against influenza illness and possibly improving birth outcomes. The 2009 influenza A/H1N1 pandemic highlighted the importance of influenza vaccination during pregnancy, after pregnant women were identified as a group with heightened morbidity and mortality during the pandemic. A few studies conducted before the 2009/10 season and a large number of reports during and after the 2009 pandemic have assessed the association between maternal influenza vaccination and birth outcomes. Although these studies indicate that influenza vaccination is safe for both the mother and the fetus, there are conflicting data on the effect of vaccination in improving preterm birth rates. We reviewed the 2 published randomized control trials and other observational studies that explored the relationship between maternal influenza vaccination and preterm births.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousPremature BirthInfluenza Vaccinesbirth outcomesimmunizationinfluenzapandemicpregnancypreterm birth

Identifiers

PMID26267701
PMCPMC4685674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.