ArticleThe New England journal of medicine2015
Primary PCI with or without Thrombectomy.
Article in The New England journal of medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thrombus aspiration in primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients with high thrombus burden: one-year outcomes in a tertiary healthcare center in Ho Chi Minh City.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2024Article
- The concept of justifiable healthcare and how big data can help us to achieve it.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2021Review
- Association of the use of manual thrombus aspiration with intracoronary thrombotic burden in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction in the real world.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2020Article
- Comparative Safety of Aspiration Thrombectomy Catheters Utilizing Prospective, Active Surveillance of the NCDR CathPCI Registry.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Comment on
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26267630What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.