Trial reportThe New England journal of medicine2015
A Randomized Trial of Intrapartum Fetal ECG ST-Segment Analysis.
Trial report in The New England journal of medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01131260 (A Randomized Trial of Fetal ECG ST Segment and T Wave Analysis as an Adjunct to Electronic Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring), which is not on this map. Cited by 45 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized Trial of Fetal ECG ST Segment and T Wave Analysis as an Adjunct to Electronic Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring (STAN)
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- ST waveform analysis vs cardiotocography alone for intrapartum fetal monitoring: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2024Pooled it
- Effectiveness of intrapartum fetal surveillance to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2021Pooled it
- Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) for fetal monitoring during labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Maternal Diabetes and Intrapartum Fetal Electrocardiogram.American journal of perinatology · 2024Trial
- Comparison of effect of CTG + STan with CTG alone on emergency Cesarean section rate: STan Australian Randomized controlled Trial (START).Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2023Trial
- Cardiotocography combined with ST analysis versus cardiotocography combined with fetal blood sampling in deliveries with abnormal CTG: a randomized trial.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2023Trial
- Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Tracing Among Small-for-Gestational Age Compared With Appropriate-for-Gestational-Age Neonates.Obstetrics and gynecology · 2018Trial
- The electrical heart axis and ST events in fetal monitoring: A post-hoc analysis following a multicentre randomised controlled trial.PloS one · 2017Trial
- Validation of the discriminatory performance of the iPREFACE score for clinically significant fetal acidemia: an outcome-enriched nested case-control study.AJOG global reports · 2026Article
- Predicting Intrapartum Acidemia: A Review of Approaches Based on Fetal Heart Rate.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Generational Leaps in Intrapartum Fetal Surveillance.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Contribution of proactive management of healthcare risks to the reduction of adverse events in a maternity hospital.BMJ open quality · 2024Article
- Perinatal and Neonatal Outcomes Using Cardiotocography Versus STAN and Cardiotocography: a Systematic Review.Maedica · 2023Article
- The impact of the introduction of intrapartum fetal ECG ST segment analysis. A population study.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2022Article
- Associations between fetal heart rate variability and umbilical cord occlusions-induced neural injury: An experimental study in a fetal sheep model.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2022Article
- Changing Perspectives of Electronic Fetal Monitoring.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2022Review
- Intrapartum Fetal Electrocardiogram in Small- and Large-for-Gestational Age Fetuses.American journal of perinatology · 2021Article
- Fetal heart rate variability analysis for neonatal acidosis prediction.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2021Article
- A new microdialysis probe for continuous lactate measurement during fetal monitoring: Proof of concept in an animal model.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2020Article
- Feasibility of non-invasive Foetal electrocardiography in a twin pregnancy.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIt is unclear whether using fetal electrocardiographic (ECG) ST-segment analysis as an adjunct to conventional intrapartum electronic fetal heart-rate monitoring modifies intrapartum and neonatal outcomes.
methodsWe performed a multicenter trial in which women with a singleton fetus who were attempting vaginal delivery at more than 36 weeks of gestation and who had cervical dilation of 2 to 7 cm were randomly assigned to "open" or "masked" monitoring with fetal ST-segment analysis. The masked system functioned as a normal fetal heart-rate monitor. The open system displayed additional information for use when uncertain fetal heart-rate patterns were detected. The primary outcome was a composite of intrapartum fetal death, neonatal death, an Apgar score of 3 or less at 5 minutes, neonatal seizure, an umbilical-artery blood pH of 7.05 or less with a base deficit of 12 mmol per liter or more, intubation for ventilation at delivery, or neonatal encephalopathy.
resultsA total of 11,108 patients underwent randomization; 5532 were assigned to the open group, and 5576 to the masked group. The primary outcome occurred in 52 fetuses or neonates of women in the open group (0.9%) and 40 fetuses or neonates of women in the masked group (0.7%) (relative risk, 1.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.87 to 1.98; P=0.20). Among the individual components of the primary outcome, only the frequency of a 5-minute Apgar score of 3 or less differed significantly between neonates of women in the open group and those in the masked group (0.3% vs. 0.1%, P=0.02). There were no significant between-group differences in the rate of cesarean delivery (16.9% and 16.2%, respectively; P=0.30) or any operative delivery (22.8% and 22.0%, respectively; P=0.31). Adverse events were rare and occurred with similar frequency in the two groups.
conclusionsFetal ECG ST-segment analysis used as an adjunct to conventional intrapartum electronic fetal heart-rate monitoring did not improve perinatal outcomes or decrease operative-delivery rates. (Funded by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and Neoventa Medical; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01131260.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.