Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26266937›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

New Caledonian crows rapidly solve a collaborative problem without cooperative cognition.

Sarah A Jelbert, Puja J Singh, Russell D Gray, Alex H Taylor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Female squirrel monkeys' (Animal behaviour · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Parrots do not show inequity aversion.Scientific reports · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Inequity aversion in dogs: a review.Learning & behavior · 2018
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Kea show no evidence of inequity aversion.Royal Society open science · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah A JelbertSchool of Psychology, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand.
Puja J SinghSchool of Psychology, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand; School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, United Kingdom.
Russell D GraySchool of Psychology, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand.
Alex H TaylorSchool of Psychology, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is growing comparative evidence that the cognitive bases of cooperation are not unique to humans. However, the selective pressures that lead to the evolution of these mechanisms remain unclear. Here we show that while tool-making New Caledonian crows can produce collaborative behavior, they do not understand the causality of cooperation nor show sensitivity to inequity. Instead, the collaborative behavior produced appears to have been underpinned by the transfer of prior experience. These results suggest that a number of possible selective pressures, including tool manufacture and mobbing behaviours, have not led to the evolution of cooperative cognition in this species. They show that causal cognition can evolve in a domain specific manner-understanding the properties and flexible uses of physical tools does not necessarily enable animals to grasp that a conspecific can be used as a social tool.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorAnimalsBiological EvolutionCognitionCrowsProblem SolvingTool Use Behavior

Identifiers

PMID26266937
PMCPMC4534463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.