Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26266928›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine experimental2014

Validation of computed tomography for measuring lung weight.

Alessandro Protti, Giacomo E Iapichino, Marta Milesi, Valentina Melis, Paola Pugni, Beatrice Comini, Massimo Cressoni, Luciano Gattinoni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Effects of regional perfusion block in healthy and injured lungs.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alessandro ProttiDipartimento di Anestesia, Rianimazione ed Emergenza Urgenza, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via F. Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy, alessandro.protti@policlinico.mi.it.
Giacomo E Iapichino
Marta Milesi
Valentina Melis
Paola Pugni
Beatrice Comini
Massimo Cressoni
Luciano Gattinoni

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLung weight characterises severity of pulmonary oedema and predicts response to mechanical ventilation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of quantitative analysis of thorax computed tomography (CT) for measuring lung weight in pigs with or without pulmonary oedema.

methodsThirty-six pigs were mechanically ventilated with different tidal volumes and positive end-expiratory pressures that did or did not induce pulmonary oedema. After 54 h, they underwent thorax CT (CT in vivo ) and were then sacrificed and exsanguinated. Fourteen pigs underwent a second thorax CT (CTpost-exsang.) after exsanguination. Lungs were excised and weighed with a balance (balancepost-exsang.). Agreement between lung weights measured with the balance (considered as reference) and those estimated by quantitative analysis of CT was assessed with Bland-Altman plots.

resultsOne animal unexpectedly died before CT in vivo . In 35 pigs, lung weight measured with balancepost-exsang. was 371 ± 184 g and that estimated with CT in vivo was 481 ± 189 g (p < 0.001). Bias between methods was -111 g (-35%) and limits of agreement were -176 (-63%) and -46 g (-8%). Measurement error was similar in animals with (-112 ± 45 g; n = 11) or without (-110 ± 27 g; n = 24) pulmonary oedema (p = 0.88). In 14 pigs with thorax CT after exsanguination, lung weight measured with balancepost-exsang. was 342 ± 165 g and that estimated with CTpost-exsang. was 352 ± 160 g (p = 0.02). Bias between methods was -9 g (-4%) and limits of agreement were -36 (-11%) and 17 g (3%). Measurement errors were similar in pigs with (-1 ± 26 g; n = 11) or without (-12 ± 7 g; n = 3) pulmonary oedema (p = 0.12).

conclusionsCompared to the balance, CT obtained in vivo constantly overestimated the lung weight, as it included pulmonary blood (whereas the balance did not). By contrast, CT obtained after exsanguination provided accurate and reproducible results.

Identifiers

PMID26266928
PMCPMC4512984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.