Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26266797›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine experimental2013

Effects of the PPAR-β/δ agonist GW0742 during resuscitated porcine septic shock.

Martin Wepler, Sebastian Hafner, Angelika Scheuerle, Matthias Reize, Michael Gröger, Florian Wagner, Florian Simon, José Matallo, Frank Gottschalch, Andrea Seifritz and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The HFrontiers in immunology · 2022
    Article
  2. Porcine models of acute kidney injury.American journal of physiology. Renal physiology · 2021
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Could Biomarkers Direct Therapy for the Septic Patient?The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2016
    Review
  10. H2S during circulatory shock: some unresolved questions.Nitric oxide : biology and chemistry · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Martin WeplerSektion Anästhesiologische Pathophysiologie und Verfahrensentwicklung, Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsklinikum, Helmholtzstrasse 8-1, Ulm, 89081, Germany, martin@wepler.de.
Sebastian Hafner
Angelika Scheuerle
Matthias Reize
Michael Gröger
Florian Wagner
Florian Simon
José Matallo
Frank Gottschalch
Andrea Seifritz
Bettina Stahl
Martin Matejovic
Amar Kapoor
Peter Möller
Enrico Calzia
Michael Georgieff
Ulrich Wachter
Josef A Vogt
Christoph Thiemermann
Peter Radermacher
Oscar McCook
University Hospital Ulm · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEQueen Mary University of London · GBUniversity Hospital Plzen · CZWilliam Harvey Research Institute · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn un-resuscitated rodent models of septic shock, the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-β/δ (PPAR-β/δ) agonist GW0742 improved visceral organ function. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis whether GW0742 would attenuate kidney injury during long-term, resuscitated, porcine polymicrobial septic shock.

methodsSix, 12, and 18 h after the induction of fecal peritonitis by inoculation of autologous feces, anesthetized, mechanically ventilated, and instrumented male pigs with pre-existing atherosclerosis resulting from familial hypercholesteremia and atherogenic diet randomly received either vehicle (dimethyl sulfoxide, n = 12) or GW0742 (n = 10). Resuscitation comprised hydroxyethyl starch and norepinephrine infusion titrated to maintain mean arterial pressure at baseline values.

resultsDespite aggressive fluid resuscitation, fecal peritonitis was associated with arterial hypotension requiring norepinephrine infusion, ultimately resulting in progressive lactic acidosis and acute kidney injury. GW0742 did not beneficially affect any parameter of systemic and regional hemodynamics, gas exchange, metabolism, or organ function. The parameters of inflammation, oxidative and nitrosative stress, and organ injury (post-mortem analysis for histomorphology and markers of apoptosis) were not influenced either. Immunohistochemistry of pre-shock kidney biopsies from a previous study in this swine strain showed markedly lower PPAR-β/δ receptor expression than in healthy animals.

conclusionsIn swine with pre-existing atherosclerosis, the PPAR-β/δ agonist GW0742 failed to attenuate septic shock-induced circulatory failure and kidney dysfunction, most likely due to reduced receptor expression coinciding with cardiovascular and metabolic co-morbidity.

Identifiers

PMID26266797
PMCPMC4796150
OpenAlexW2107624507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.