ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2016
Phase I dose escalation study of amrubicin plus paclitaxel in previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-World Incidence of Febrile Neutropenia among Patients Treated with Single-Agent Amrubicin: Necessity of the Primary Prophylactic Administration of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- The Novel Triazolonaphthalimide Derivative LSS-11 Synergizes the Anti-Proliferative Effect of Paclitaxel via STAT3-Dependent MDR1 and MRP1 Downregulation in Chemoresistant Lung Cancer Cells.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe conducted a phase I dose escalation study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the recommended dose (RD) and the safety profile of amrubicin (AMR) plus paclitaxel (PTX) combination regimen for patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND
methodsPTX was administered at a fixed dose of 150 mg/m(2)/day on day 1 and AMR was intravenously administered at a starting dose of 25 mg/m(2)/day on days 1-3, and this was repeated every 4 weeks. Doses of each drug were planned as follows-level 0, 20/150; level 1, 25/150; level 2, 30/150; level 3, 30/180 AMR mg/m(2) per day/PTX mg/m(2) per day.
resultsTwelve patients were enrolled in this study. The dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of the regimen was assessed during the first cycle. At level 1, all three patients developed a DLT due to grade 4 neutropenia lasting >4 days, grade 4 thrombocytopenia and grade 3 febrile neutropenia. Therefore, level 1 was considered the MTD and level 0 was selected as the RD. Objective responses were seen in two patients (response rate 16.7 %). Overall disease control rate was 91.7 %.
conclusionsThe combination of AMR and PTX is a feasible and well-tolerated regimen for the treatment of patients with previously treated advanced NSCLC. Although our study included a small number of patients, encouraging disease control and progression-free survival were achieved at the recommended doses. Further clinical trials are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26266640What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.