SynthesisMedicine2015
Genetic Association Studies Reporting on Variants in the C-Reactive Protein Gene and Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- C-reactive protein in cardiovascular disease: clinical associations, conformation-dependent biology, and therapeutic perspectives.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- The Role of C-Reactive Protein in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Unmasking Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Insights.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
C-reactive protein (CRP) is a commonly used inflammatory marker and elevated CRP levels are shown to increase the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD). Sequence variations in the CRP gene believed to influence the protein levels have been extensively investigated in CAD community. Most of the published studies, however, have reported mixed findings. The objective of the present study was to examine the associations of CRP variants (+942G>C, -717A>G, +1444C>T) with genetic risk of CAD by use of a meta-analysis.The human case-control studies were identified through online search, hand search, and contacting the authors of original articles. We performed both random-effect and fixed-effect meta-analysis to estimate CAD risk (odds ratios, OR). This analysis combined 16 studies in total. We found +942G>C was not associated with CAD risk when all data were pooled together, nor did we find a significant association in subgroup analyses. Meta-analysis of +1444C>T studies showed a similar trend. However, a borderline association with CAD risk was revealed for -717A>G (random-effect: OR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.28-1.00 for the homozygous model; random-effect: OR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.26-1.00 for the recessive model).These data suggest that the CRP gene variants examined may not modulate CAD risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.