Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26266201›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR2015

Preliminary Experience and Morbidity Analysis of Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) from a Tertiary Cancer Center in India.

Naveen Padmanabhan, Barath Raj Kumar, Ansar Pullampara Pookunju, Ayyapan Srinivasan, Vikash Mahajan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Naveen PadmanabhanRegistrar, Department of Surgical Oncology, Apollo Speciality Hospitals , Chennai, India .
Barath Raj KumarRegistrar, Department of Surgical Oncology, Apollo Speciality Hospitals , Chennai, India .
Ansar Pullampara PookunjuSenior Registrar, Department of Surgical Oncology, Apollo Speciality Hospitals , Chennai, India .
Ayyapan SrinivasanHead and Senior Consultant, Department, of Surgical Oncology, Apollo Speciality Hospitals , Chennai, India .
Vikash MahajanSenior Consultant, Department of Surgical Oncology, Apollo Speciality Hospitals , Chennai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) can arise directly from peritoneum (primary) or from regional spread of gastrointestinal and gynecological malignancies. It is often considered a terminal event. CRS/HIPEC procedure provides encouraging outcomes in select sub-set of patients with PC. In this study we present our initial experience of this combined procedure from a tertiary cancer care center in India. MATERIALS AND

methodsBetween January 2014 to January 2015, 13 patients underwent CRS + HIPEC procedure at our center. Preoperative assessment for cytoreduction was done using contrast CT-scan of the abdomen and staging laparoscopy. All procedures were performed by the same surgical team. After cytoreduction, HIPEC was performed by closed method.

resultsMedian patient age was 52 and median PCI was 13.5 (5-21). Ovarian cancers were commonest origin of PC in our series. All patients had a complete cytoreduction with a median operative time of 8.3 hours. Postoperative ileus was the commonest adverse event. In the immediate postoperative period, major complications were observed in 23% (3/13) of our patients (1. intra-abdominal abscess 2. Septicemia and liver function derangement 3. Bowel obstruction which required a re-operation. Median hospital stay was 12 days (range 9-45 days) and there was no perioperative mortality.

conclusionOur initial results indicate that CRS + HIPEC procedure can be performed with acceptable morbidity and no mortality. Appropriate case selection by a multi-disciplinary team is vital to achieve complete cytoreduction and optimize outcomes.

Indexed as

CarcinomatosisColorectal neoplasmOvarian neoplasmRegional chemoperfusion

Identifiers

PMID26266201
PMCPMC4525591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.