Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26266174›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR2015

Sacral Agenesis with Neurogenic Bladder Dysfunction-A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Seema Sharma, Vipin Sharma, Bhanu Awasthi, Manik Sehgal, Deeksha A Singla

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Chilli Sign: Pathognomonic Sign for Ruling Out Sacral Agenesis on Foetal MRI.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2017
    Article
  11. Caudal Regression Syndrome with Pressure Ulcers of the Foot: A Case Report.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Seema SharmaAssociate Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Dr Rajendra Prasad Govt Medical College and Hospital , HP, India .
Vipin SharmaAssociate Professor, Department of Orthopedics, Dr Rajendra Prasad Govt Medical College and Hospital , HP, India .
Bhanu AwasthiProfessor and Head, Department of Orthopedics, Dr Rajendra Prasad Govt Medical College and Hospital , HP, India .
Manik SehgalJunior Resident, Department of Orthopedics, Dr Rajendra Prasad Govt Medical College and Hospital , HP, India .
Deeksha A SinglaJunior Resident, Department of Pediatrics, Dr Rajendra Prasad Govt Medical College and Hospital , HP, India .
Rajendra Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sacral agenesis (part of the caudal regression syndrome) is a rare and severe sacral developmental abnormality. It is a congenital malformation of unknown aetiology with possible involvement of genetic and teratogenic factors. It is described by various degrees of developmental failure, the most extreme and rare being sirenomelia or mermaid syndrome. The associated malformations comprise anorectal, vertebral, urological, genital, and lower limb anomalies. Approximately 15-20% mothers of these children have insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. The case is being reported for its rarity and educative value because prognosis is good in isolated sacral agenesis.

Indexed as

AnomaliesCaudal regression syndromeSirenomelia

Identifiers

PMID26266174
PMCPMC4525563
OpenAlexW2418104016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.