ArticleJournal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR2015
'Tamsulosin and Darifenacin' Versus 'Tamsulosin Monotherapy' for 'BPH with Accompanying Overactive Bladder'.
Article in Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative Effectiveness of Newer Medications for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Attributed to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.European urology · 2017Pooled it
- Comparative Efficacy of Different Drugs for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms due to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Review
- Efficacy and safety of dose escalation in male patients with overactive bladder showing poor efficacy after low-dose antimuscarinic treatment: A retrospective multicenter study.Investigative and clinical urology · 2020Article
- Effects ofSaudi journal of biological sciences · 2018Article
- Treatment of Concomitant OAB and BPH.Current urology reports · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the efficacy/safety of 'tamsulosin and darifenacin' (TD) vs. 'tamsulosin and placebo' (TP) for patients with symptomatic benign prostrate hyperplasia (BPH) with accompanying overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study included symptomatic patients of BPH with one or more of the following OAB symptoms; micturition frequency >8, nocturnal frequency > 2, urgency > 1 per 24 hour between November 2012 and February 2014. After protocol approval by ethics committee and obtaining informed consent, patients were randomly assigned to receive tamsulosin 0.4mg plus placebo (TP) (n=30) or tamsulosin 0.4 mg plus darifenacin 7.5 mg (TD) (n=30) for 8 weeks. The mean change from baseline in urinary frequency and incontinence episodes/24 hour (primary end points), and nocturnal frequency; mean change in PVR and changes in IPSS (secondary end points) were compared between groups at 0/eight week using voiding diary and ultrasonography.
resultsThe mean change in frequency, incontinence, nocturnal frequency/24 hour and IPSS (International prostrate symptom score) were (-4.83 vs. -3.93, p=0.023), (-1.50 vs. 1.08, p=0.001), (-2.20 vs. -1.87, p<0.001) and (-7.90 vs. -6.27, p<0.001) in the TD/TP group respectively (significant). Apart from some minor side effects (12 vs. 9) all interventions appeared to be safe and well tolerated. The mean change in the PVR (Postvoid residual) was marginal (+10.84ml and -16.93) and the incidence of urinary retention was 13% and 3% in the TD and TP groups respectively (p=0.35).
conclusionTreatment with tamsulosin and darifenacin for 8 weeks is an effective and safe treatment modality in select patients of BPH with accompanying OAB symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.