Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26266120›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR2015

Prevalence of MLSB Resistance and Observation of erm A & erm C Genes At A Tertiary Care Hospital.

Ameer Abbas, Preeti Srivastava, Prem Singh Nirwan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Nasal Carriage of Methicillin-ResistantInterdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases · 2025
    Article
  2. A Small Multihost Plasmid CarryingFrontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Nasal Carriage of Methicillin-ResistantInternational journal of microbiology · 2021
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ameer AbbasPhD Student, Department of Microbiology, National Institute of Medical Sciences Jaipur, India .
Preeti SrivastavaAssociate Professor, Department of Microbiology, National Institute of Medical Sciences Jaipur, India .
Prem Singh NirwanHead and Professor, Department of Microbiology, National Institute of Medical Sciences Jaipur, India .
NIMS University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe increasing resistance to macrolide, lincosamide, streptogramin B (MLSB) agents among Staphylococcus aureus is becoming a challenge to microbiologist. Clindamycin has been a useful drug for treatment of infection caused by the staphylococcus aureus, but change in clindamycin sensitivity pattern due to various mechanisms is leading to therapeutic failure. One of the important mechanisms is mediation of resistance by erm genes. Staphylococcus strains which have erm genes show inducible clindamycin resistance that cannot be determined by routine disk diffusion test resulting in treatment failure.

aimThis study was aimed to detect the prevalence of MLSBi and MLSBc resistance and observation of erm A & erm C genes among MLSBi isolates. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total 500 Staphylococcus aureus were isolated; they were checked by disk induction test (D- Test). Those isolates which showed inducible clindamycin resistance were randomly selected and subjected to PCR for the observation of erm A and erm C genes.

resultsPrevalence of MLSBi and MLSBc isolates were almost similar that is 10.8% and 11.6% respectively. MLSBi isolates showed more resistance to drugs when compared to MLSBc isolates. Neither of MLSBi and MLSBc isolates was resistant to Vancomycin and Linezolid. Inducible clindamycin was mainly due to presence of erm A gene.

conclusionD- test should be mandatory at every microbiology laboratory and should be used in routine antibiotic procedure which will minimize the misuse of drug ultimately minimize the risk of treatment failure. PCR should be performed for the detection of genes responsible for erythromycin resistance as it is a quick and most sensitive method.

Indexed as

D- testerm genesMRSAPCRStaphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

PMID26266120
PMCPMC4525509
OpenAlexW2395032743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.