Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26266118›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR2015

Fungal Culture Positivity in Patients with Perforation Peritonitis.

Neerja Jindal, Shilpa Arora, Sumeet Pathania

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Neerja JindalProfessor and Head, Department of Microbiology, GGS Medical College and Hospital , Faridkot, India .
Shilpa AroraAssistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, GGS Medical College and Hospital , Faridkot, India .
Sumeet PathaniaJunior Resident, Department of Surgery, GGS Medical College and Hospital , Faridkot, India .
Guru Gobind Singh Medical College and Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPerforation peritonitis is the most common surgical emergency. A large number of microorganisms have been cultured from the abdominal fluid obtained from patients with gastrointestinal perforation peritonitis. The present study was undertaken to determine the frequency of positive fungal culture in perforation peritonitis as Candida co-infection is reported to be a bad prognostic factor in these patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe intraoperative specimens of abdominal fluid collected during laparotomy from 140 consecutive patients of gastro-intestinal perforation were analysed by microbial culture for bacteria and fungi. Their antimicrobial susceptibility was also studied.

resultsThe mean presenting age of the patients was 35 years and 120 (85.7%) of them were males. Aerobic Gram Negative Bacilli (AGNB) were observed in 82 (79.6%) of the culture positive abdominal fluid specimens, of which 58 (70.7%) were Escherichia coli. Gram negative bacteria were most frequently isolated from colorectal perforation (100%) while Gram positive bacteria were from upper gastrointestinal perforation (47.2%). Candida was cultured in as many as 68 of 140 (48.6%) specimens. Its prevalence was highest in patients with gastroduodenal perforation (70.5%) and was altogether absent in patients having appendicular perforation.

conclusionHigh prevalence of fungal culture positivity of peritoneal fluid of patients of perforation peritonitis shows that along with the bacterial culture, fungal cultures should always be asked for in such patients. Adequate and timely antimicrobial treatment including treatment of fungal infection could help reduce mortality in this group of patients.

Indexed as

CandidaIntra-abdominal floraPrognosisSignificance

Identifiers

PMID26266118
PMCPMC4525507
OpenAlexW2403661781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.