ArticleJournal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR2015
Role of Perceptual Factors on Endurance Profiles on Treadmill Exercise.
Article in Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Involvement of Cardiorespiratory Capacity on the Acute Effects of Caffeine on Autonomic Recovery.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2019Trial
- Caffeine affects autonomic control of heart rate and blood pressure recovery after aerobic exercise in young adults: a crossover study.Scientific reports · 2017Trial
- Lower Systolic Blood Pressure in Normotensive Subjects is Related to Better Autonomic Recovery Following Exercise.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Salivary total protein as a biomarker of anaerobic threshold in elderly athletes subjected to an incremental physical test.Biology of sport · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextIt is common practice to unravel signs of possible cardiac ischemia by exposing the heart to graded degrees of exercise stress on treadmill under close monitoring and terminating it at safe limit. The safe limit of exercise duration and intensity is based on subjects who report a sense of exhaustion or appearance of any defined adverse sign whichever is earlier. Commonly, endurance is determined by subjective perception of distress leading to discontinuation of exercise.
aimScope of favourable manipulation of perception of stress was evaluated to extend the duration of exercise, and thereby the endurance. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe indices of endurance such as duration of exercise, the distance covered and equivalents of O2 consumption (METs) as well as Cardiovascular adaptational changes of 30 young healthy male medical students are compared between two sets of conditions; {1} Routine treadmill exercise without intervention (Mode A) and later {2} same exercise repeated with individualized musical experience to favourably distract the perception of stress (Mode B).
resultIt has been conclusively demonstrated that perceptual modification of stress in Mode B caused significant improvement in endurance profiles, reflected by sustenance of longer duration of exercise, correspondingly greater cumulative distance covered and greater METs. Cardiovascular parameters of heart rate and blood pressure rise are comparatively less in Mode B, though not significant. The extent of cardiac stress evaluated by Rate-Pressure (R-P) product is also lesser spite of longer duration of exercise, pointing to better cardiovascular adaptational changes under states of perceptual modification (Mode B).
conclusionIts relevance to day-to-day physical activities including exercise is obviously to make them enjoyable, rather than monotonous, for maximal benefit to health and endurance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.