ArticleJMIR research protocols2015
Patient-Centered mHealth Living Donor Transplant Education Program for African Americans: Development and Analysis.
Article in JMIR research protocols, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Systematic Review of the Technology Acceptance Model in Health Informatics.Applied clinical informatics · 2018Pooled it
- Preconception Care Education for Women With Diabetes: A Systematic Review of Conventional and Digital Health Interventions.Journal of medical Internet research · 2016Pooled it
- Acceptability of a Mobile-Health Living Kidney Donor Advocacy Program for Black Wait-Listed Patients.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Trial
- Design and approach of the Living Organ Video Educated Donors (LOVED) program to promote living kidney donation in African Americans.Contemporary clinical trials · 2017Trial
- Barriers and facilitators of integrating telemedicine services into routine kidney transplant patient care: a scoping review of qualitative research.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2025Article
- Racial Equity in Living Donor Kidney Transplant Centers, 2008-2018.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Implementation of a culturally competentBMJ open · 2023Article
- Telehealth Use by Living Kidney Donor Transplant Programs During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond: a Practical Approach.Current transplantation reports · 2021Review
- A Digital Library for Increasing Awareness About Living Donor Kidney Transplants: Formative Study.JMIR formative research · 2020Article
- Perspectives on implementing mobile health technology for living kidney donor follow-up: In-depth interviews with transplant providers.Clinical transplantation · 2019Article
- Use of Twitter in communicating living solid organ donation information to the public: An exploratory study of living donors and transplant professionals.Clinical transplantation · 2019Article
- Living Organ Video Educated Donors Program for Kidney Transplant-eligible African Americans to Approach Potential Donors: A Proof of Concept.Transplantation direct · 2018Article
- Role of telehealth in renal replacement therapy education.Seminars in dialysis · 2018Review
- Predictors and Moderators of Educational Interventions to Increase the Likelihood of Potential Living Donors for Black Patients Awaiting Kidney Transplantation.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2016Article
- Telemedicine pharmacy services implementation in organ transplantation at a metropolitan academic medical center.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere is a critical need to expand the pool of available kidneys for African Americans who are on the transplant wait-list due to the disproportionally lower availability of deceased donor kidneys compared with other races/ethnic groups. Encouraging living donation is one method to fill this need. Incorporating mHealth strategies may be a way to deliver educational and supportive services to African American transplant-eligible patients and improve reach to those living in remote areas or unable to attend traditional group-session-based programs. Before program development, it is essential to perform formative research with target populations to determine acceptability and cultivate a patient-centered and culturally relevant approach to be used for program development.
objectiveThe objectives of this study were to investigate African American kidney transplant recipients' and kidney donors'/potential donors' attitudes and perceptions toward mobile technology and its viability in an mHealth program aimed at educating patients about the process of living kidney donation.
methodsUsing frameworks from the technology acceptance model and self-determination theory, 9 focus groups (n=57) were administered to African Americans at a southeastern medical center, which included deceased/living donor kidney recipients and living donors/potential donors. After a demonstration of a tablet-based video education session and explanation of a group-based videoconferencing session, focus groups examined members' perceptions about how educational messages should be presented on topics pertaining to the process of living kidney donation and the transplantation. Questionnaires were administered on technology use and perceptions of the potential program communication platform. Transcripts were coded and themes were examined using NVivo 10 software.
resultsQualitative findings found 5 major themes common among all participants. These included the following: (1) strong support for mobile technology use; (2) different media formats were preferred; (3) willingness to engage in video chats, but face-to-face interaction sometimes preferred; (4) media needs to be user friendly; (5) high prevalence of technology access. Our results show that recipients were willing to spend more time on education than the donors group, they wanted to build conversation skills to approach others, and preferred getting information from many sources, whereas the donor group wanted to hear from other living donors. The questionnaires revealed 85% or more of the sample scored 4+ on a 5-point Likert scale, which indicates high degree of interest to use the proposed program, belief that other mHealth technologies would help with adherence to medical regimens, and doctors would make regimen adjustments quicker. In addition, high utilization of mobile technology was reported; 71.9% of the participants had a mobile phone and 43.9% had a tablet.
conclusionsOur study supports the use of an mHealth education platform for African Americans to learn about living donation. However, potential recipients and potential donors have differing needs, and therefore, programs should be tailored to each target audience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.