ReviewJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2015
Neuron matters: electric activation of neuronal tissue is dependent on the interaction between the neuron and the electric field.
Review in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation Does Not Improve Working Memory in Schizophrenia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.Neuropsychology review · 2021Pooled it
- Dose-response in modulating brain function with transcranial direct current stimulation: From local to network levels.PLoS computational biology · 2023Trial
- Investigating the feasibility of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation to facilitate post-stroke overground gait performance in chronic stroke: a partial least-squares regression approach.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2021Trial
- Manufacturing, Cell Regulation, and Coculture Strategies for Vascularization and Neural Innervation of Skeletal Muscle Tissue.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Ultrasound Activated Piezoelectric Dural Patches to Drive Endogenous Neural Stem Cell-Mediated Repair Traumatic Brain Injury.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Tracking Synaptic Vesicles in Live Neurons Using Single-Molecule Super-resolution Microscopy.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Combined effects of red light and direct-current electric fields on neurite growth in 3D neural cell cultures.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Precision non-invasive brain stimulation: anJournal of neural engineering · 2025Article
- Restore axonal conductance in a locally demyelinated axon with electromagnetic stimulation.Journal of neural engineering · 2025Article
- Modulating excitation/inhibition balance through transcranial electrical stimulation: physiological mechanisms in animal models.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Review
- Emerging Pro-neurogenic Therapeutic Strategies for Neurodegenerative Diseases: A Review of Pre-clinical and Clinical Research.Molecular neurobiology · 2025Review
- Effects of induced electric field on the sensitivity of a two-compartment neuron model.PloS one · 2025Article
- Multi-scale modeling to investigate the effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on morphologically-realistic neuron with depression.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2024Article
- Keratan sulfate, an electrosensory neurosentient bioresponsive cell instructive glycosaminoglycan.Glycobiology · 2024Review
- Cellular mechanisms underlying carry-over effects after magnetic stimulation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Amplitude- and frequency-dependent activation of layer II/III neurons by intracortical microstimulation.iScience · 2023Article
- Article
- Cytoelectric coupling: Electric fields sculpt neural activity and "tune" the brain's infrastructure.Progress in neurobiology · 2023Article
- Pulsed Radiofrequency 2 Hz Preserves the Dorsal Root Ganglion Neuron Physiological CaJournal of pain research · 2023Article
- Improving focality and consistency in micromagnetic stimulation.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In laboratory research and clinical practice, externally-applied electric fields have been widely used to control neuronal activity. It is generally accepted that neuronal excitability is controlled by electric current that depolarizes or hyperpolarizes the excitable cell membrane. What determines the amount of polarization? Research on the mechanisms of electric stimulation focus on the optimal control of the field properties (frequency, amplitude, and direction of the electric currents) to improve stimulation outcomes. Emerging evidence from modeling and experimental studies support the existence of interactions between the targeted neurons and the externally-applied electric fields. With cell-field interaction, we suggest a two-way process. When a neuron is positioned inside an electric field, the electric field will induce a change in the resting membrane potential by superimposing an electrically-induced transmembrane potential (ITP). At the same time, the electric field can be perturbed and re-distributed by the cell. This cell-field interaction may play a significant role in the overall effects of stimulation. The redistributed field can cause secondary effects to neighboring cells by altering their geometrical pattern and amount of membrane polarization. Neurons excited by the externally-applied electric field can also affect neighboring cells by ephaptic interaction. Both aspects of the cell-field interaction depend on the biophysical properties of the neuronal tissue, including geometric (i.e., size, shape, orientation to the field) and electric (i.e., conductivity and dielectricity) attributes of the cells. The biophysical basis of the cell-field interaction can be explained by the electromagnetism theory. Further experimental and simulation studies on electric stimulation of neuronal tissue should consider the prospect of a cell-field interaction, and a better understanding of tissue inhomogeneity and anisotropy is needed to fully appreciate the neural basis of cell-field interaction as well as the biological effects of electric stimulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.