Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26265297›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of physical anthropology2016

Localized population divergence of vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus spp.) in South Africa: Evidence from mtDNA.

Trudy R Turner, Willem G Coetzer, Christopher A Schmitt, Joseph G Lorenz, Nelson B Freimer, J Paul Grobler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of physical anthropology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Trudy R TurnerDepartment of Anthropology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, 53201.
Willem G CoetzerDepartment of Genetics, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, 9300, South Africa.
Christopher A SchmittCenter for Neurobehavioral Genetics, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095.
Joseph G LorenzDepartment of Anthropology and Museum Studies, Central Washington University, Ellensburg, WA, 98926.
Nelson B FreimerCenter for Neurobehavioral Genetics, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095.
J Paul GroblerDepartment of Genetics, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, 9300, South Africa.

Funding

Vervet Monkey (Cercopithecus Aethiops) Genetic MapR01RR016300 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI FREIMER, NELSON B. · 2002 to 2011
$6.3M
NCRR NIH HHS R01 RR016300NCRR NIH HHS R01RR0163009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveVervet monkeys are common in most tree-rich areas of South Africa, but their absence from grassland and semi-desert areas of the country suggest potentially restricted and mosaic local population patterns that may have relevance to local phenotype patterns and selection. A portion of the mitochondrial DNA control region was sequenced to study patterns of genetic differentiation.

methodsDNA was extracted, and mitochondrial DNA sequences were obtained from 101 vervet monkeys at 15 localities, which represent both an extensive (widely across the distribution range) and intensive (more than one troop at most of the localities) sampling strategy. Analyses utilized Arlequin 3.1, MEGA 6, BEAST v1.5.2, and Network V3.6.1.

resultsThe dataset contained 26 distinct haplotypes, with six populations fixed for single haplotypes. Pairwise P-distance among population pairs showed significant differentiation among most population pairs, but with nonsignificant differences among populations within some regions. Populations were grouped into three broad clusters in a maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree and a haplotype network. These clusters correspond to i) north-western, northern, and north-eastern parts of the distribution range as well as the northern coastal belt; ii) central areas of the country; and iii) southern part of the Indian Ocean coastal belt and adjacent inland areas.

conclusionsApparent patterns of genetic structure correspond to current and past distribution of suitable habitat, geographic barriers to gene flow, geographic distance, and female philopatry. However, further work on nuclear markers and other genomic data are necessary to confirm these results.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnthropology, PhysicalChlorocebus aethiopsDNA, MitochondrialEvolution, MolecularFemaleGenetics, PopulationMalePhylogenySouth AfricaDNA, MitochondrialmicroevolutionmtDNApopulation geneticsSouth Africavervet

Identifiers

PMID26265297
PMCPMC4715607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.