Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26265132›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2015

Integrated analyses of zebrafish miRNA and mRNA expression profiles identify miR-29b and miR-223 as potential regulators of optic nerve regeneration.

Paula I Fuller-Carter, Kim W Carter, Denise Anderson, Alan R Harvey, Keith M Giles, Jennifer Rodger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. DeregulatedCells · 2019
    Article
  15. Plasma levels of miR-29b and miR-200b in type 2 diabetic retinopathy.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2019
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Paula I Fuller-CarterExperimental and Regenerative Neurosciences, School of Animal Biology; University of Western Australia, Crawley, 6009, , WA, Australia. paula.fuller@uwa.edu.au.
Kim W CarterMcCusker Charitable Foundation Bioinformatics Centre, Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, 6008, Subiaco, WA, Australia. Kim.Carter@telethonkids.org.au.
Denise AndersonCentre for Biostatistics, Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, 6008, Subiaco, WA, Australia. Denise.Anderson@telethonkids.org.au.
Alan R HarveySchool of Physiology, Anatomy and Human Biology, University of Western Australia, Crawley, 6009, , WA, Australia. alan.harvey@uwa.edu.au.
Keith M GilesCentre for Medical Research, University of Western Australia, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, Nedlands, 6008, WA, Australia. keith.giles@nyumc.org.
Jennifer RodgerExperimental and Regenerative Neurosciences, School of Animal Biology; University of Western Australia, Crawley, 6009, , WA, Australia. jennifer.rodger@uwa.edu.au.
University of Western Australia · AUPerron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science · AUThe Kids Research Institute Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnlike mammals, zebrafish have the ability to regenerate damaged parts of their central nervous system (CNS) and regain functionality of the affected area. A better understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in zebrafish regeneration may therefore provide insight into how CNS repair might be induced in mammals. Although many studies have described differences in gene expression in zebrafish during CNS regeneration, the regulatory mechanisms underpinning the differential expression of these genes have not been examined.

resultsWe used microarrays to analyse and integrate the mRNA and microRNA (miRNA) expression profiles of zebrafish retina after optic nerve crush to identify potential regulatory mechanisms that underpin central nerve regeneration. Bioinformatic analysis identified 3 miRNAs and 657 mRNAs that were differentially expressed after injury. We then combined inverse correlations between our miRNA expression and mRNA expression, and integrated these findings with target predictions from TargetScan Fish to identify putative miRNA-gene target pairs. We focused on two over-expressed miRNAs (miR-29b and miR-223), and functionally validated seven of their predicted gene targets using RT-qPCR and luciferase assays to confirm miRNA-mRNA binding. Gene ontology analysis placed the miRNA-regulated genes (eva1a, layna, nefmb, ina, si:ch211-51a6.2, smoc1, sb:cb252) in key biological processes that included cell survival/apoptosis, ECM-cytoskeleton signaling, and heparan sulfate proteoglycan binding,

conclusionOur results suggest a key role for miR-29b and miR-223 in zebrafish regeneration. The identification of miRNA regulation in a zebrafish injury model provides a framework for future studies in which to investigate not only the cellular processes required for CNS regeneration, but also how these mechanisms might be regulated to promote successful repair and return of function in the injured mammalian brain.

Indexed as

Nerve RegenerationAnimalsComputational BiologyFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Regulatory NetworksMaleMicroRNAsOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisOptic NerveOptic Nerve InjuriesZebrafishmicroRNA-223, zebrafishmicroRNA-29, zebrafishMicroRNAs

Identifiers

PMID26265132
PMCPMC4534052
OpenAlexW2151534369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.