Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26264902›Full record

Observational studyFamilial cancer2015

The effect of personal medical history and family history of cancer on the uptake of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy.

Jessica E van der Aa, Jacob P Hoogendam, Els S F Butter, Margreet G E M Ausems, René H M Verheijen, Ronald P Zweemer

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Familial cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jessica E van der AaDepartment of Gynaecological Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jacob P HoogendamDepartment of Gynaecological Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Els S F ButterDepartment of Gynaecological Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Margreet G E M AusemsDepartment of Medical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
René H M VerheijenDepartment of Gynaecological Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Ronald P ZweemerDepartment of Gynaecological Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands. r.zweemer@umcutrecht.nl.
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLCancer Genomics Centre · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Women with an increased lifetime risk of ovarian cancer are advised to undergo risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) to reduce risk of adnexal cancer. We investigated the uptake of RRSO and evaluated the influence of personal medical history of (breast) cancer, risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) and family history of ovarian and/or breast cancer on the RRSO decision. This single center retrospective observational cohort study was performed in a tertiary multidisciplinary clinic for hereditary cancer of the University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands. Women ≥35 years old with an estimated lifetime risk of ovarian cancer ≥10%, who had completed childbearing, were eligible for RRSO. Uptake and timing of RRSO were analyzed. Influence of personal medical history and family history on RRSO decision making, were evaluated with logistic regression. The study population consisted of 218 women (45.0% BRCA1 mutation carrier, 28.0% BRCA2 mutation carrier, 27.0% with familial susceptibility) with 87.2% RRSO uptake. The median age at RRSO was 44.5 (range 28-73) years. Of the women undergoing RRSO, 78.3% needed ≤3 consultations to reach this decision. Multivariable analysis showed a significant difference in RRSO uptake for women with a history of RRM [OR 3.66 95% CI (1.12-11.98)], but no significant difference in women with a history of breast cancer [OR 1.38 95% CI (0.50-3.79)], nor with a family history of ovarian and/or breast cancer [OR 1.10 95% CI (0.44-2.76)]. We conclude that RRSO counseling, without the alternative of screening, is effective. The uptake is increased in women with a history of RRM.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseRisk Reduction BehaviorAdultAgedBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGerm-Line MutationHeterozygoteHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingNetherlandsOvarian NeoplasmsOvariectomyBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanBRCA1BRCA2Hereditary ovarian cancerProphylactic surgery uptakeRisk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy

Identifiers

PMID26264902
PMCPMC4630248
OpenAlexW1950152693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.