Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26264852›Full record

SynthesisBMC health services research2015

Process of care in outpatient Integrative healthcare facilities: a systematic review of clinical trials.

Suzanne J Grant, Jane Frawley, Alan Bensoussan

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Guidance for establishing an integrative oncology service in the Australian healthcare setting-a discussion paper.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Suzanne J GrantNational Institute of Complementary Medicine, University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia. s.grant@uws.edu.au.
Jane FrawleyAustralian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. jane.e.frawley@student.uts.edu.au.
Alan BensoussanNational Institute of Complementary Medicine, University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia. a.bensoussan@uws.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients currently integrate complementary medicine (CM) and allopathic, choosing a combination of therapies rather than a single therapy in isolation. Understanding integrative healthcare (IHC) extends beyond evaluation of specific therapies to encompass evaluations of multidisciplinary complex interventions. IHC is defined as a therapeutic strategy integrating conventional and complementary medical practices and practitioners in a shared care setting to administer an individualized treatment plan. We sought to review the outcomes of recent clinical trials, explore the design of the interventions and to discuss the methodological approaches and issues that arise when investigating a complex mix of interventions in order to guide future research.

methodFive databases were searched from inception to 30 March 2013. We included randomized and quasi-experimental clinical trials of IHC. Data elements covering process of care (initial assessment, treatment planning and review, means for integration) were extracted.

resultsSix thousand two hundred fifty six papers were screened, 5772 were excluded and 484 full text articles retrieved. Five studies met the inclusion criteria. There are few experimental studies of IHC. Of the five studies conducted, four were in people with lower back pain. The positive findings of these studies indicate that it is feasible to conduct a rigorous clinical trial of an integrative intervention involving allopathic and CM treatment. Further, such interventions may improve patient outcomes.

conclusionsThe trials in our review provide a small yet critical base from which to refine and develop larger studies. Future studies need to be adequately powered to address efficacy, safety and include data on cost effectiveness.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Care FacilitiesDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedOutpatientsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicComplementary TherapiesCost-Benefit AnalysisDatabases, FactualDelivery of Health CareHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID26264852
PMCPMC4534115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.