ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2016
Comparison of end-tidal CO2 measured by transportable capnometer (EMMA™ capnograph) and arterial pCO2 in general anesthesia.
Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02184728 (Comparison of End-tidal Carbon Dioxide), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of End-tidal Carbon Dioxide (ETCO2) Measured by Transportable Capnometer (EMMATM) and the Arterial pCO2 in General Anesthesia
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Technical validation of the EMMA capnometer under hyperbaric conditions.Diving and hyperbaric medicine · 2023Article
- Clinical usefulness of end-tidal COThe clinical respiratory journal · 2023Article
- At-home end-tidal carbon dioxide measurement in children with invasive home mechanical ventilation.Pediatric pulmonology · 2022Article
- Inhaled COEnvironmental health insights · 2022Article
- Breath Biomarkers in Diagnostic Applications.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Limitations of End-Tidal CO2 Measured with a Portable Capnometer to Estimate PaCO2 for Patients with Respiratory Disease.Turkish thoracic journal · 2021Article
- Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2016 end of year summary: respiration.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An end-tidal CO2 monitor (capnometer) is used most often as a noninvasive substitute for PaCO2 in anesthesia, anesthetic recovery, and intensive care. Additionally, the wide spread on-site use of portable capnometers in emergency and trauma situations is now observed. This study was conducted to compare PaCO2 measurement between the EMMA™ portable-capnometer and sidestream capnometry. End-tidal CO2 (portable capnometer: EMMA™ capnograph, side stream capnometry module: Datex-Ohmeda S5 Anesthesia Monitor) levels were recorded at the time of arterial blood gas sampling of patients undergoing general anesthesia. Data were compared using the Bland and Altman method, and by evaluating the clinical significance performed by calculating the percent error (%). A total of 100 data were obtained from 35 patients. The bias of PaCO2 and portable capnometer was 6.0 mmHg, where the upper and lower limits of the agreement were 11.8 and 0.3 mmHg, respectively. The percent error was 18.0 %. The bias of side stream capnometry and portable capnometer was 2.2 mmHg, where the upper and the lower limits of the agreement were 6.0 and -1.6 mmHg, respectively. The percent error was 13.0 %. Significant differences between the PETCO2 and PaCO2 values of the EMMA™ portable-capnometer were not observed for patients undergoing general anesthesia. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02184728.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.