Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26264607›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2016

Comparison of end-tidal CO2 measured by transportable capnometer (EMMA™ capnograph) and arterial pCO2 in general anesthesia.

Kyung Woo Kim, Hey Ran Choi, Si Ra Bang, Jeong-Wook Lee

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02184728 (Comparison of End-tidal Carbon Dioxide), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02184728 nacompletednot on this map

Comparison of End-tidal Carbon Dioxide (ETCO2) Measured by Transportable Capnometer (EMMATM) and the Arterial pCO2 in General Anesthesia

TypeinterventionalSponsorInje UniversityRan2014 to 2015Enrolled35ConditionsEnd Tidal Carbon Dioxide of Patients Undergoing General AnesthesiaArmsEnd-tidal CO2(portable capnometer)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Clinical usefulness of end-tidal COThe clinical respiratory journal · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Inhaled COEnvironmental health insights · 2022
    Article
  5. Breath Biomarkers in Diagnostic Applications.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kyung Woo KimSeoul Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Inje University, 9, Marunnai-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul, Korea.
Hey Ran ChoiSeoul Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Inje University, 9, Marunnai-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul, Korea.
Si Ra BangSeoul Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Inje University, 9, Marunnai-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul, Korea. sira1045@naver.com.
Jeong-Wook LeeSeoul Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Inje University, 9, Marunnai-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul, Korea.
Inje University Seoul Paik Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An end-tidal CO2 monitor (capnometer) is used most often as a noninvasive substitute for PaCO2 in anesthesia, anesthetic recovery, and intensive care. Additionally, the wide spread on-site use of portable capnometers in emergency and trauma situations is now observed. This study was conducted to compare PaCO2 measurement between the EMMA™ portable-capnometer and sidestream capnometry. End-tidal CO2 (portable capnometer: EMMA™ capnograph, side stream capnometry module: Datex-Ohmeda S5 Anesthesia Monitor) levels were recorded at the time of arterial blood gas sampling of patients undergoing general anesthesia. Data were compared using the Bland and Altman method, and by evaluating the clinical significance performed by calculating the percent error (%). A total of 100 data were obtained from 35 patients. The bias of PaCO2 and portable capnometer was 6.0 mmHg, where the upper and lower limits of the agreement were 11.8 and 0.3 mmHg, respectively. The percent error was 18.0 %. The bias of side stream capnometry and portable capnometer was 2.2 mmHg, where the upper and the lower limits of the agreement were 6.0 and -1.6 mmHg, respectively. The percent error was 13.0 %. Significant differences between the PETCO2 and PaCO2 values of the EMMA™ portable-capnometer were not observed for patients undergoing general anesthesia. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02184728.

Indexed as

Blood Gas AnalysisTidal VolumeAdultAgedAnesthesia, GeneralCapnographyCarbon DioxideCritical CareFemaleHumansHypercapniaHypocapniaMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, PhysiologicPartial PressureCarbon DioxideBlood gas analysisCapnometryCarbon dioxide analysisCardiopulmonary resuscitation

Identifiers

PMID26264607
OpenAlexW1161135938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.