Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26264559›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2015

leBIBIQBPP: a set of databases and a webtool for automatic phylogenetic analysis of prokaryotic sequences.

Jean-Pierre Flandrois, Guy Perrière, Manolo Gouy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. First Bacteremia Due toAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  6. Psychrobacter piechaudii shunt infection: first report of human infection.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2022
    Article
  7. Screening and Characterization ofBiotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2022
    Article
  8. Microorganisms · 2022
    Article
  9. Roots of the xerophyteSaudi journal of biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  10. Access microbiology · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Access microbiology · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. JMM case reports · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jean-Pierre FlandroisLaboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, UMR CNRS 5558, Université Claude Bernard - Lyon 1, 43 bd. du 11 Novembre 1918, Villeurbanne, 69622, France. jean-pierre.flandrois@univ-lyon1.fr.
Guy PerrièreLaboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, UMR CNRS 5558, Université Claude Bernard - Lyon 1, 43 bd. du 11 Novembre 1918, Villeurbanne, 69622, France. guy.perriere@univ-lyon1.fr.
Manolo GouyLaboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, UMR CNRS 5558, Université Claude Bernard - Lyon 1, 43 bd. du 11 Novembre 1918, Villeurbanne, 69622, France. manolo.gouy@univ-lyon1.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEstimating the phylogenetic position of bacterial and archaeal organisms by genetic sequence comparisons is considered as the gold-standard in taxonomy. This is also a way to identify the species of origin of the sequence. The quality of the reference database used in such analyses is crucial: the database must reflect the up-to-date bacterial nomenclature and accurately indicate the species of origin of its sequences. DESCRIPTION: leBIBI(QBPP) is a web tool taking as input a series of nucleotide sequences belonging to one of a set of reference markers (e.g., SSU rRNA, rpoB, groEL2) and automatically retrieving closely related sequences, aligning them, and performing phylogenetic reconstruction using an approximate maximum likelihood approach. The system returns a set of quality parameters and, if possible, a suggested taxonomic assigment for the input sequences. The reference databases are extracted from GenBank and present four degrees of stringency, from the "superstringent" degree (one type strain per species) to the loosely parsed degree ("lax" database). A set of one hundred to more than a thousand sequences may be analyzed at a time. The speed of the process has been optimized through careful hardware selection and database design.

conclusionleBIBI(QBPP) is a powerful tool helping biologists to position bacterial or archaeal sequence commonly used markers in a phylogeny. It is a diagnostic tool for clinical, industrial and environmental microbiology laboratory, as well as an exploratory tool for more specialized laboratories. Its main advantages, relatively to comparable systems are: i) the use of a broad set of databases covering diverse markers with various degrees of stringency; ii) the use of an approximate Maximum Likelihood approach for phylogenetic reconstruction; iii) a speed compatible with on-line usage; and iv) providing fully documented results to help the user in decision making.

Indexed as

Databases, Nucleic AcidInternetPhylogenySoftwareArchaeaBacteriaComputational BiologyLikelihood FunctionsRNA, ArchaealRNA, BacterialRNA, RibosomalSequence Analysis, RNARNA, ArchaealRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal

Identifiers

PMID26264559
PMCPMC4531848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.