ArticleBMC bioinformatics2015
leBIBIQBPP: a set of databases and a webtool for automatic phylogenetic analysis of prokaryotic sequences.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Performance and practicality of 16S nanopore sequencing for routine bacterial identification in clinical samples.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Identifying Infectious Agents in Snakes (Boidae and Pythonidae) with and Without Respiratory Disease.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Detection of Mycoplasma spp. from snakes from five different families.BMC veterinary research · 2025Article
- The lost generation of Pemphigus populiglobuli (Hemiptera, Aphididae): exploring the taxonomy of the Svalbard aphids of genus Pemphigus.Zoological letters · 2024Article
- First Bacteremia Due toAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Psychrobacter piechaudii shunt infection: first report of human infection.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2022Article
- Screening and Characterization ofBiotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2022Article
- Article
- Roots of the xerophyteSaudi journal of biological sciences · 2022Article
- Article
- Isolation and Characterization of Phosphate SolubilizingMicroorganisms · 2021Article
- Draft genome sequence of Promicromonospora panici sp. nov., a novel ionizing-radiation-resistant actinobacterium isolated from roots of the desert plant Panicum turgidum.Extremophiles : life under extreme conditions · 2021Article
- A Sample-to-Report Solution for Taxonomic Identification of Cultured Bacteria in the Clinical Setting Based on Nanopore Sequencing.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2020Article
- Unusual subdural empyema in a homeless patient diagnosed by molecular approach: a case report.BMC infectious diseases · 2020Article
- Assessment of Borrelia miyamotoi in febrile patients and ticks in Alsace, an endemic area for Lyme borreliosis in France.Parasites & vectors · 2020Article
- Article
- Benefits of Polymerase Chain Reaction Combined With Culture for the Diagnosis of Bone and Joint Infections: A Prospective Test Performance Study.Open forum infectious diseases · 2019Article
- Hybridization capture reveals microbial diversity missed using current profiling methods.Microbiome · 2018Article
- CTX-M-15-Producing Shewanella Species Clinical Isolate Expressing OXA-535, a Chromosome-Encoded OXA-48 Variant, Putative Progenitor of the Plasmid-Encoded OXA-436.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEstimating the phylogenetic position of bacterial and archaeal organisms by genetic sequence comparisons is considered as the gold-standard in taxonomy. This is also a way to identify the species of origin of the sequence. The quality of the reference database used in such analyses is crucial: the database must reflect the up-to-date bacterial nomenclature and accurately indicate the species of origin of its sequences. DESCRIPTION: leBIBI(QBPP) is a web tool taking as input a series of nucleotide sequences belonging to one of a set of reference markers (e.g., SSU rRNA, rpoB, groEL2) and automatically retrieving closely related sequences, aligning them, and performing phylogenetic reconstruction using an approximate maximum likelihood approach. The system returns a set of quality parameters and, if possible, a suggested taxonomic assigment for the input sequences. The reference databases are extracted from GenBank and present four degrees of stringency, from the "superstringent" degree (one type strain per species) to the loosely parsed degree ("lax" database). A set of one hundred to more than a thousand sequences may be analyzed at a time. The speed of the process has been optimized through careful hardware selection and database design.
conclusionleBIBI(QBPP) is a powerful tool helping biologists to position bacterial or archaeal sequence commonly used markers in a phylogeny. It is a diagnostic tool for clinical, industrial and environmental microbiology laboratory, as well as an exploratory tool for more specialized laboratories. Its main advantages, relatively to comparable systems are: i) the use of a broad set of databases covering diverse markers with various degrees of stringency; ii) the use of an approximate Maximum Likelihood approach for phylogenetic reconstruction; iii) a speed compatible with on-line usage; and iv) providing fully documented results to help the user in decision making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.