Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26264552›Full record

SynthesisEuropean heart journal2015

Reduced appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy after cardiac resynchronization therapy-induced left ventricular function recovery: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Neal A Chatterjee, Attila Roka, Steven A Lubitz, Michael R Gold, Claude Daubert, Cecilia Linde, Jan Steffel, Jagmeet P Singh, Theofanie Mela

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European heart journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Native QRS duration and outcomes in heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction: results from a large-scaled registry.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Cardiac implantable electronic device upgrades and downgrades: a Clinical Consensus Statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Association (APHRS), Canadian Heart Rhythm Society (CHRS), Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS).Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Downgrade from CRT-D to CRT-P at time of generator replacement: a true clinical conundrum or just an academic debate?Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2023
    Article
  10. Managing arrhythmia in cardiac resynchronisation therapy.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Heart failure as a substrate and trigger for ventricular tachycardia.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Emerging Therapeutic Approaches.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Neal A ChatterjeeDepartment of Medicine and the Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, GRB 109, Massachusetts General Hospital Heart Center, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02411, USA.
Attila RokaDepartment of Medicine and the Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, GRB 109, Massachusetts General Hospital Heart Center, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02411, USA.
Steven A LubitzDepartment of Medicine and the Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, GRB 109, Massachusetts General Hospital Heart Center, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02411, USA.
Michael R GoldDivision of Cardiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Claude DaubertCardiology Division, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France.
Cecilia LindeDepartment of Cardiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jan SteffelDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Jagmeet P SinghDepartment of Medicine and the Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, GRB 109, Massachusetts General Hospital Heart Center, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02411, USA.
Theofanie MelaDepartment of Medicine and the Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, GRB 109, Massachusetts General Hospital Heart Center, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02411, USA tmela@mgh.harvard.edu.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes · FRKarolinska University Hospital · SEMedical University of South Carolina · USUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CH

Funding

Atrial Fibrillation: Bridging genetic discovery and clinical associationsK23HL114724 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI LUBITZ, STEVEN A · 2013 to 2017
$893k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL114724NHLBI NIH HHS K23HL114724
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsFor patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD; CRT-D), the effect of an improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on appropriate ICD therapy may have significant implications regarding management at the time of ICD generator replacement. METHODS AND

resultsWe conducted a meta-analysis to determine the effect of LVEF recovery following CRT on the incidence of appropriate ICD therapy. A search of multiple electronic databases identified 709 reports, of which 6 retrospective cohort studies were included (n = 1740). In patients with post-CRT LVEF ≥35% (study n = 4), the pooled estimated rate of ICD therapy (5.5/100 person-years) was significantly lower than patients with post-CRT LVEF <35% [incidence rate difference (IRD): -6.5/100 person-years, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): -8.8 to -4.2, P < 0.001]. Similarly, patients with post-CRT LVEF ≥45% (study n = 4) demonstrated lower estimated rates of ICD therapy (2.3/100 person-years) compared with patients without such recovery (IRD: -5.8/100 person-years, 95% CI: -7.6 to -4.0, P < 0.001). Restricting analysis to studies discounting ICD therapies during LVEF recovery (study n = 3), patients with LVEF recovery (≥35 or ≥45%) had significantly lower rates of ICD therapy compared with patients without such recovery (P for both <0.001). Patients with primary prevention indication for ICD, regardless of LVEF recovery definition, had very low rates of ICD therapy (0.4 to 0.8/100-person years).

conclusionRecovery of LVEF post-CRT is associated with significantly reduced appropriate ICD therapy. Patients with improvement of LVEF ≥45% and those with primary prevention indication for ICD appear to be at lowest risk.

Indexed as

AgedCardiac Resynchronization TherapyDefibrillators, ImplantableFemaleHeart FailureHumansMaleRecovery of FunctionStroke VolumeTachycardia, VentricularVentricular Dysfunction, LeftMeta-analysisResynchronizationVentricular tachyarrhythmia

Identifiers

PMID26264552
PMCPMC4628643
OpenAlexW1917047027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.