Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26264519›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Serum matrix metalloproteinase-9 in colorectal cancer family-risk population screening.

Olalla Otero-Estévez, Loretta De Chiara, Mar Rodríguez-Girondo, Francisco Javier Rodríguez-Berrocal, Joaquín Cubiella, Inés Castro, Vicent Hernández, Vicenta Soledad Martínez-Zorzano

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Anticancer Activity ofBiomolecules · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Extracellular Matrix Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Olalla Otero-EstévezDepartment of Biochemistry, Genetics and Immunology, Universidade de Vigo. Vigo, Spain.
Loretta De ChiaraDepartment of Biochemistry, Genetics and Immunology, Universidade de Vigo. Vigo, Spain.
Mar Rodríguez-GirondoSiDOR Research Group &Centro de Investigaciones Biomédicas (CINBIO), Universidade de Vigo. Vigo, Spain.
Francisco Javier Rodríguez-BerrocalDepartment of Biochemistry, Genetics and Immunology, Universidade de Vigo. Vigo, Spain.
Joaquín CubiellaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense. Ourense, Spain.
Inés CastroDepartment of Gastroenterology, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense. Ourense, Spain.
Vicent HernándezDepartment of Gastroenterology, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo. Vigo, Spain.
Vicenta Soledad Martínez-ZorzanoDepartment of Biochemistry, Genetics and Immunology, Universidade de Vigo. Vigo, Spain.
Universidade de Vigo · ESComplejo Hospitalario de Ourense · ESComplexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) is related to tumour development and progression in colorectal cancer (CRC) and its utility as biomarker has been suggested. The aim of our study was to measure serum MMP-9 in asymptomatic first-degree relatives of CRC patients, and to analyse its diagnostic accuracy for the detection of advanced neoplasia (AN: advanced adenomas and CRC). Additionally, we compared its diagnostic capability with the most used non-invasive faecal immunochemical test (FIT). Serum MMP-9 was quantified by ELISA in 516 asymptomatic individuals that underwent a colonoscopy and a FIT. MMP-9 levels were significantly related to age and gender and therefore the concentration was corrected by these confounders. Corrected MMP-9 (cMMP-9) levels were higher in individuals with advanced adenomas (AA; p-value = 0.029) and AN (p-value = 0.056) compared to individuals with no neoplasia. Moreover, elevated cMMP-9 concentration was associated with more severe characteristics of adenomas (number of lesions, size and histology). Nevertheless, the diagnostic accuracy of cMMP-9 was considerably lower than that of FIT for identifying AA (22.64% vs. 47.17% sensitivity, 90% specificity) or AN (19.30% vs. 52.63% sensitivity, 90% specificity). According to our results, serum MMP-9 cannot be considered of utility for the diagnosis of AN in CRC family-risk population screening.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorCohort StudiesColorectal NeoplasmsEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFecesFemaleHumansMaleMatrix Metalloproteinase 9Middle AgedRisk FactorsBiomarkers, TumorMatrix Metalloproteinase 9

Identifiers

PMID26264519
PMCPMC4532998
OpenAlexW2419243575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.