ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2016
Preoperative vaginal estrogen and midurethral sling exposure: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictors of vaginal mesh exposure after midurethral sling placement: a case-control study.International urogynecology journal · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisWe evaluated whether the use of estrogen vaginally prior to synthetic midurethral sling insertion mediates the risk of mesh exposure. A secondary aim was to evaluate other factors that may be associated with mesh exposure.
methodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing midurethral sling insertion from January to December 2010 within the Southern California Permanente Medical Group. Women who used estrogen vaginally prior to surgery were classified as those who filled a prescription between 1 and 45 days before surgery or whose medical records indicated its use at the time of preoperative evaluation. Logistic regression analysis was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) for factors associated with mesh exposure while controlling for confounding variables.
resultsA total of 1544 patients met inclusion criteria, of whom 248 (16.1 %) used estrogen vaginally prior to surgery. Mean age was 53.7 years (range 27-89). Thirty-seven (2.4 %) women were diagnosed with mesh exposure, of whom 19 underwent surgical reoperation. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, preoperative use of estrogen vaginally was not associated with the risk of mesh exposure (OR 0.79, CI 0.26-2.38, p = 0.67). Age, body mass index, menopausal status, use of hormone replacement therapy, smoking status, and diabetes were not associated with risk of mesh exposure.
conclusionsPreoperative use of estrogen vaginally did not appear to mediate the risk of mesh exposure following midurethral sling placement in this cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.