Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26264453›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2015

Developing educational competencies for dissemination and implementation research training programs: an exploratory analysis using card sorts.

Margaret Padek, Graham Colditz, Maureen Dobbins, Nikolas Koscielniak, Enola K Proctor, Anne E Sales, Ross C Brownson

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06718322 (Towards Large-Scale Adaptation and Tailored Implementation of Primary Cancer Prevention Programs Across 9 Countries), which is not on this map. Cited by 67 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06718322 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Towards Large-Scale Adaptation and Tailored Implementation of Primary Cancer Prevention Programs Across 9 Countries

TypeinterventionalSponsorHidde van der PloegRan2024 to 2026Enrolled100ConditionsFocus of Study: Tailored ImplementationArmsPrimary Cancer Prevention Implementation Toolkit (PCP-IT)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Toward equity in cultivating a "Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Designing viable, durable physical activity programs for cancer survivors: reflections from program participants and organizational leaders.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Margaret PadekPrevention Research Center in St. Louis, Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Dr., St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA. mpadek@wustl.edu.
Graham ColditzDivision of Public Health Sciences and Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, 660 South Euclid Ave., St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA. colditzg@wustl.edu.
Maureen DobbinsSchool of Nursing, National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools, McMaster University, 175 Longwood Road South, Suite 210a, Hamilton, ON, L8P 0A1, Canada. dobbinsm@mcmaster.ca.
Nikolas KoscielniakPrevention Research Center in St. Louis, Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Dr., St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA. nik.koscielniak@gmail.com.
Enola K ProctorGeorge Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Dr., St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA. ekp@wustl.edu.
Anne E SalesCenter for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. salesann@umich.edu.
Ross C BrownsonPrevention Research Center in St. Louis, Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Dr., St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA. rbrownson@wustl.edu.

Funding

Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesUL1TR000448 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
Washington University Center for Diabetes Translation Research P30DK092950 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Ross C Brownson, Debra Haire-Joshu · 2011 to 2026
$11.7M
Disseminating Evidence-Based Interventions to Control CancerR01CA160327 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BROWNSON, ROSS C · 2012 to 2017
$2.8M
Mentored Training for Dissemination and Implemention Research in CancerR25CA171994 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BROWNSON, ROSS C · 2013 to 2017
$1.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000448NCI NIH HHS 5R01CA160327NCI NIH HHS 5R25CA171994-02NCI NIH HHS R01 CA160327NCI NIH HHS R25 CA171994
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith demand increasing for dissemination and implementation (D&I) training programs in the USA and other countries, more structured, competency-based, and tested curricula are needed to guide training programs. There are many benefits to the use of competencies in practice-based education such as the establishment of rigorous standards as well as providing an additional metrics for development and growth. As the first aim of a D&I training grant, an exploratory study was conducted to establish a new set of D&I competencies to guide training in D&I research.

methodsBased upon existing D&I training literature, the leadership team compiled an initial list of competencies. The research team then engaged 16 additional colleagues in the area of D&I science to provide suggestions to the initial list. The competency list was then additionally narrowed to 43 unique competencies following feedback elicited from these D&I researchers. Three hundred additional D&I researchers were then invited via email to complete a card sort in which the list of competencies were sorted into three categories of experience levels. Participants had previous first-hand experience with D&I or knowledge translation training programs in the past. Participants reported their self-identified D&I expertise level as well as the country in which their home institution is located. A mean score was calculated for each competency based on their experience level categorization. From these mean scores, beginner-, intermediate-, and advanced-level tertiles were created for the competencies.

resultsThe card sort request achieved a 41 % response rate (n = 124). The list of 43 competencies was organized into four broad domains and sorted based on their experience level score. Eleven competencies were classified into the "Beginner" category, 27 into "Intermediate," and 5 into "Advanced."

conclusionsEducation and training developers can use this competency list to formalize future trainings in D&I research, create more evidence-informed curricula, and enable overall capacity building and accompanying metrics in the field of D&I training and research.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchCompetency-Based EducationCurriculumEducational MeasurementHumansInformation DisseminationProgram Development

Identifiers

PMID26264453
PMCPMC4534127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.